On 2/21/2008 12:17 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:36:23AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
[Greg KH]
I know he's in the CC:, but I'm not sure he's reading this
thread, and I'm hesitant to bother people about things out
On 2/20/2008 2:29 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
In other words: I don't think that's likely to be practical in the
present instance. If you have reason to believe otherwise (past
positive experience with Novell, for instance), I'd be glad to
On 2/20/2008 12:15 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
Hmm. One thing which just sprang to mind, in the stab-in-the-dark
category: in 2.6.24.2, launching the program on some machines gave
warnings along the lines of "this program is using a deprecated
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
With those two problems out of the way, what is left is the
hard-drive issue, and that is also halfway fixed by enabling ACPI.
Specifically, it is "fixed" in that the kernel sees the hard drive
and I can mount it, but it is not fixed in that
On 2/16/2008 10:35 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
Until this thread, I was not even aware that ACPI was related to
USB; I had largely conflated it with a similar acronym which I
think is related to power management and which I can suddenly not
even find in
On 2/16/2008 10:35 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
Messages sent to my address directly are explicitly not filtered
into the folders I have set up for various mailing lists, so that
if someone does send me a "heads up" reply for a specific topic on
And, since there is no longer anything specifically kernel-related in
this subthread, I do not intend to reply publicly in it again unless
requested to do so.
--
Andrew Buehler
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
On 2/16/2008 6:11 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
For another, getting two copies of a message is no big deal --
I disagree.
Everyone has his own taste. Obviously there's no world-wide
consensus, possibly because different people have different wor
to avoid it and still make sure all relevant people receive
the message.)
On 2/16/2008 10:20 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Oliver Pinter wrote:
On 2/15/08, Andrew Buehler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In my workplace, I use a customized version of Novell's ZENworks
imag
9 matches
Mail list logo