Re: USB regression (and other failures) in 2.6.2[45]* - mostly resolved

2008-02-21 Thread Andrew Buehler
On 2/21/2008 12:17 PM, Greg KH wrote: On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:36:23AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote: [Greg KH] I know he's in the CC:, but I'm not sure he's reading this thread, and I'm hesitant to bother people about things out

Re: USB regression (and other failures) in 2.6.2[45]* - mostly resolved

2008-02-21 Thread Andrew Buehler
On 2/20/2008 2:29 PM, Alan Stern wrote: On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote: In other words: I don't think that's likely to be practical in the present instance. If you have reason to believe otherwise (past positive experience with Novell, for instance), I'd be glad to

Re: USB regression (and other failures) in 2.6.2[45]* - mostly resolved

2008-02-20 Thread Andrew Buehler
On 2/20/2008 12:15 PM, Alan Stern wrote: On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote: Hmm. One thing which just sprang to mind, in the stab-in-the-dark category: in 2.6.24.2, launching the program on some machines gave warnings along the lines of "this program is using a deprecated

Re: USB regression (and other failures) in 2.6.2[45]* - mostly resolved

2008-02-20 Thread Andrew Buehler
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote: With those two problems out of the way, what is left is the hard-drive issue, and that is also halfway fixed by enabling ACPI. Specifically, it is "fixed" in that the kernel sees the hard drive and I can mount it, but it is not fixed in that

Re: USB regression (and other failures) in 2.6.2[45]* - mostly resolved

2008-02-19 Thread Andrew Buehler
On 2/16/2008 10:35 PM, Alan Stern wrote: On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote: Until this thread, I was not even aware that ACPI was related to USB; I had largely conflated it with a similar acronym which I think is related to power management and which I can suddenly not even find in

Re: USB regression (and other failures) in 2.6.2[45]*

2008-02-17 Thread Andrew Buehler
On 2/16/2008 10:35 PM, Alan Stern wrote: On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote: Messages sent to my address directly are explicitly not filtered into the folders I have set up for various mailing lists, so that if someone does send me a "heads up" reply for a specific topic on

Re: USB regression (and other failures) in 2.6.2[45]*

2008-02-17 Thread Andrew Buehler
And, since there is no longer anything specifically kernel-related in this subthread, I do not intend to reply publicly in it again unless requested to do so. -- Andrew Buehler - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL

Re: USB regression (and other failures) in 2.6.2[45]*

2008-02-16 Thread Andrew Buehler
On 2/16/2008 6:11 PM, Alan Stern wrote: On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote: For another, getting two copies of a message is no big deal -- I disagree. Everyone has his own taste. Obviously there's no world-wide consensus, possibly because different people have different wor

Re: USB regression (and other failures) in 2.6.2[45]*

2008-02-16 Thread Andrew Buehler
to avoid it and still make sure all relevant people receive the message.) On 2/16/2008 10:20 AM, Alan Stern wrote: On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Oliver Pinter wrote: On 2/15/08, Andrew Buehler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In my workplace, I use a customized version of Novell's ZENworks imag