On Mon, 31 Dec 2018, Finn Thain wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Dec 2018, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> >
> > That said, as has been pointed out, the current #ifdef has a failing
> > corner case when both are modular (because the code should then be
> > included). The runtime macro that correctly expresses
On Sun, 30 Dec 2018, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> That said, as has been pointed out, the current #ifdef has a failing
> corner case when both are modular (because the code should then be
> included). The runtime macro that correctly expresses this is
> IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_NVRAM).
>
No, in th
On Sun, 2018-12-30 at 18:50 +0100, LEROY Christophe wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann a écrit :
> > On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 3:51 AM Michael Schmitz
> > wrote:
[...]
> > > (On second thought - I don't want to speculate whether there's
> > > weird compiler options that could result in the
> > > nvram_check_ch
Arnd Bergmann a écrit :
On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 3:51 AM Michael Schmitz wrote:
Hi Finn,
Am 29.12.2018 um 15:34 schrieb Finn Thain:
> On Sat, 29 Dec 2018, Michael Schmitz wrote:
>
>>
>> IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_NVRAM) is probably what Christophe really
meant to suggest.
>>
>> Or (really going ou
These patches fix cases where a subsequent statement is aligned
with the right hand side of an assignment rather than the left
hand side. This was done using the following semantic match
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/). It has a lot of false positives,
because Coccinelle doesn't record the differenc
Delete tab aligning a statement with the right hand side of a
preceding assignment rather than the left hand side.
Found with the help of Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall
---
drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/
6 matches
Mail list logo
