On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 09:20 +0530, Jitendra Bhivare wrote:
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Joe Perches [mailto:j...@perches.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 3:57 PM
> > To: Jitendra Bhivare; Christophe JAILLET; Jayamohan Kallickal; Ketan
> Mukadam
> >
> > Cc: Bart Van Assche;
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Perches [mailto:j...@perches.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 3:57 PM
> To: Jitendra Bhivare; Christophe JAILLET; Jayamohan Kallickal; Ketan
Mukadam
> Cc: Bart Van Assche; James E.J. Bottomley; Martin K. Petersen; linux-
> s...@vger.kernel.org; linux-ke
On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 01:19 +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 08/14/16 10:29, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Sun, 2016-08-14 at 17:09 +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > > My primary concern is how to enable and disable log messages from user
> > > space.
[]
> > I think you are looking for a system wide
> "Don" == Don Brace writes:
Don,
Don> I am thinking that you mean users will need to have some kind of
Don> notification that newer kernels will require that the smartpqi
Don> driver be configured, especially if they are already booting from
Don> the aacraid driver.
One issue is Kconfig. Y
On 08/14/16 10:29, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-08-14 at 17:09 +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> My primary concern is how to enable and disable log messages from user
>> space. Many drivers define their own logging macros and export a bitmask
>> that allows to enable and disable logging messag
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:20:25AM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 15/08/16 21:14, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 11:43:12AM -0500, Shaun Tancheff wrote:
> >> Hmm ... Since REQ_SECURE implied REQ_DISCARD doesn't this
> >> mean that we should include REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE checki
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153241
Bug ID: 153241
Summary: Kernel (unconditionally?) repeatedly attempts to issue
SMART commands via ATA pass-through
Product: IO/Storage
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 4.4.14
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:18:52AM -0700, Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> Thank you for the suggestion.
>
> > Who are you execting to pull this huge patch series?
>
> The last pull request was addressed to Al as per Arnd's suggestion.
> I'm not completely sure who should it be addressed to.
>
> > Why no
Thank you for the suggestion.
> Who are you execting to pull this huge patch series?
The last pull request was addressed to Al as per Arnd's suggestion.
I'm not completely sure who should it be addressed to.
> Why not just introduce the new api call, wait for that to be merged, and
> then push t
On Fri, 12 Aug 2016, 9:24pm -, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> > "Sebastian" == Sebastian Andrzej Siewior writes:
>
> Sebastian> On 2016-07-04 19:40:37 [+0200], To linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
> wrote:
> >> The driver creates its own per-CPU threads which are updated based on
> >> CPU hotplu
yes - planned to start that today
-- james
On 8/16/2016 3:01 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
Looks fine,
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig
Hey James,
Can you collect review tags, address CR comments and resend the series?
I'd like to stage these for 0-day testing and try to get it into 4.9.
Than
Full flags list at include/scsi/scsi_devinfo.h
Arrays controllers included currently:
{"3PARdata", "VV", NULL, BLIST_REPORTLUN2},
{"DEC", "HSG80", NULL, BLIST_REPORTLUN2 | BLIST_NOSTARTONADD},
{"HP", "A6189A", NULL, BLIST_SPARSELUN | BLIST_LARGELUN},
{"COMPAQ", "MSA1000", NULL, BLIST_SPARSEL
Some SATA to USB bridges fail to cooperate with some
drives resulting in no cache being present being reported
to the host. That causes the host to skip sending
a command to synchronize caches. That causes data loss
when the drive is powered down.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Neukum
---
Documentation/k
On Tue, 2016-08-16 at 00:44 -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> > "Oliver" == Oliver Neukum writes:
>
> Oliver,
>
> Oliver> wce_default_on controls the default if the device provides no
> Oliver> indication. The problem here is that the indication the device
> Oliver> provides must be overrid
On Tue, 2016-08-16 at 11:32 +0530, Jitendra Bhivare wrote:
> Thanks Joe for taking this up. It has been pending for long time from our
> side.
Thanks, not a problem, it took ~10 minutes.
There was a bit of an issue about your reply though.
First there was ~50 k of quoted stuff without any conten
Looks fine,
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig
Hey James,
Can you collect review tags, address CR comments and resend the series?
I'd like to stage these for 0-day testing and try to get it into 4.9.
Thanks,
Sagi.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the
On 15/08/16 21:14, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 11:43:12AM -0500, Shaun Tancheff wrote:
>> Hmm ... Since REQ_SECURE implied REQ_DISCARD doesn't this
>> mean that we should include REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE checking
>> wherever REQ_OP_DISCARD is being checked now in drivers/scsi/sd.c
17 matches
Mail list logo
