Re: Concerns about "mpt2sas: Added Reply Descriptor Post Queue (RDPQ) Array support"

2015-04-01 Thread James Bottomley
On Thu, 2015-04-02 at 16:39 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 21:45 -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > > > Ben, this is legal by design. It was specifically designed for the > > aic79xx SCSI card, but can be used for a variety of other reasons. The > > aic79xx hardware pr

[Bug 95101] scsi/mpt2sas: setpci reset results in kernel oops

2015-04-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95101 --- Comment #2 from Nagarajkumar N --- Created attachment 172971 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=172971&action=edit mpt2sas pci resource removal synchronization patch The attached patch need to applied on latest linux main git

Re: Concerns about "mpt2sas: Added Reply Descriptor Post Queue (RDPQ) Array support"

2015-04-01 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 21:45 -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > Ben, this is legal by design. It was specifically designed for the > aic79xx SCSI card, but can be used for a variety of other reasons. The > aic79xx hardware problem was that the DMA engine could address the whole > of memory (it had t

Re: [RFC 00/22] target: se_node_acl LUN list RCU conversion

2015-04-01 Thread Nicholas A. Bellinger
On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 00:04 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:51:56PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > Since last week, enable/disable device_list code has been converted to > > use mempool + call_rcu() and performs the RCU pointer swap in > > se_node_acl->lun_entr

Re: [PATCH-v2 02/15] target: Add protected fabric + unprotected device support

2015-04-01 Thread Nicholas A. Bellinger
On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 12:04 +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > On 4/1/2015 8:49 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 10:51 +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > >> On 3/30/2015 6:28 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > >>> From: Nicholas Bellinger > >>> > >>> This patch adds a new target_co

Re: [PATCH v1] ata: ahci_xgene: Add AHCI Support for second generation of APM X-Gene SoC

2015-04-01 Thread Mark Rutland
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 07:18:19PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 06:30:30PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 06:00:33PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > > The driver in general should not be ARM specific, though it runs on an > > > ARMv8

Re: [PATCH v1] ata: ahci_xgene: Add AHCI Support for second generation of APM X-Gene SoC

2015-04-01 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 06:30:30PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 06:00:33PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > The driver in general should not be ARM specific, though it runs on an > > ARMv8 platform. But looking at the patch it has some errata workarounds > > tri

Re: [PATCH v1] ata: ahci_xgene: Add AHCI Support for second generation of APM X-Gene SoC

2015-04-01 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 06:00:33PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 05:39:56PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 12:31:16PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 12:13:36PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > > > Signed-off-by : Suma

Re: [PATCH v1] ata: ahci_xgene: Add AHCI Support for second generation of APM X-Gene SoC

2015-04-01 Thread Mark Rutland
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 06:00:33PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 05:39:56PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 12:31:16PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 12:13:36PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > > > Signed-off-by : Suma

Re: [PATCH v1] ata: ahci_xgene: Add AHCI Support for second generation of APM X-Gene SoC

2015-04-01 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 05:39:56PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 12:31:16PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 12:13:36PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > > Signed-off-by : Suman Tripathi > > > > > > Applied to libata/for-4.1 w/ minor edit. > > >

Re: [PATCH v1] ata: ahci_xgene: Add AHCI Support for second generation of APM X-Gene SoC

2015-04-01 Thread Tejun Heo
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 05:39:56PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 12:31:16PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 12:13:36PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > > Signed-off-by : Suman Tripathi > > > > > > Applied to libata/for-4.1 w/ minor edit. > > >

Re: [PATCH v1] ata: ahci_xgene: Add AHCI Support for second generation of APM X-Gene SoC

2015-04-01 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 12:31:16PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 12:13:36PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > Signed-off-by : Suman Tripathi > > > > Applied to libata/for-4.1 w/ minor edit. > > Reverted due to build failure from missing asm/cputype.h. I'm guessing this is some k

Re: [PATCH v1] ata: ahci_xgene: Add AHCI Support for second generation of APM X-Gene SoC

2015-04-01 Thread Suman Tripathi
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 12:13:36PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Signed-off-by : Suman Tripathi > > Applied to libata/for-4.1 w/ minor edit. Reverted due to build failure from missing asm/cputype.h. Suman, you're the develper and familiar with how the prerequisite patches are flowing where. When

Re: [PATCH v1] ata: ahci_xgene: Add AHCI Support for second generation of APM X-Gene SoC

2015-04-01 Thread Tejun Heo
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 12:13:36PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Signed-off-by : Suman Tripathi > > Applied to libata/for-4.1 w/ minor edit. Reverted due to build failure from missing asm/cputype.h. Suman, you're the develper and familiar with how the prerequisite patches are flowing where. When

Re: [PATCH v1] ata: ahci_xgene: Add AHCI Support for second generation of APM X-Gene SoC

2015-04-01 Thread Tejun Heo
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 08:18:02PM +0530, Suman Tripathi wrote: > This patch enables full AHCI feature support for APM X-Gene SoC SATA host host > controller. The following errata's are removed: > > 1. 2a0bdff6b95 ("ahci-xgene: fix the dma state machine lockup for the > IDENTIFY D

[PATCH v1] ata: ahci_xgene: Add AHCI Support for second generation of APM X-Gene SoC

2015-04-01 Thread Suman Tripathi
This patch enables full AHCI feature support for APM X-Gene SoC SATA host host controller. The following errata's are removed: 1. 2a0bdff6b95 ("ahci-xgene: fix the dma state machine lockup for the IDENTIFY DEVICE PIO mode command") 2. 09c32aaa368 ("ahci_xgene: Fix the dma state ma

[PATCH v1] ata: ahci_xgene: Enable native NCQ and FBS for second generation of X-Gene SoC.

2015-04-01 Thread Suman Tripathi
Signed-off-by: Suman Tripathi --- Suman Tripathi (1): ata: ahci_xgene: Add AHCI Support for second generation of APM X-Gene SoC drivers/ata/ahci_xgene.c | 21 - 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 1.8.2.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

[PATCH] change SCSI Maintainer email

2015-04-01 Thread James Bottomley
We've recently suffered a rebranding and the Service Provider half of Parallels has become Odin. This means my email has changed so update the MAINTAINERS file (and tidy up the pointers to our git trees to be correct). Signed-off-by: James Bottomley --- diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS i

Re: [PATCH-v2 02/15] target: Add protected fabric + unprotected device support

2015-04-01 Thread Sagi Grimberg
On 4/1/2015 8:49 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 10:51 +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote: On 3/30/2015 6:28 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: From: Nicholas Bellinger This patch adds a new target_core_fabric_ops callback for allowing fabric drivers to expose a TPG attribute for

Re: [RFC 00/22] target: se_node_acl LUN list RCU conversion

2015-04-01 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:51:56PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > Since last week, enable/disable device_list code has been converted to > use mempool + call_rcu() and performs the RCU pointer swap in > se_node_acl->lun_entry_hlist[] under se_node_acl->lun_entry_mutex. Why use a mempool the