Hello
I use target LIO for all my storage array test targets and customer problem
resolution here at Red Hat.
This patch resulted from a requirement to mimic behaviour of an expensive
hardware jammer for a customer.
I have used this for some time with good success to simulate and reproduce
late
On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 14:25 -0500, James Smart wrote:
> ---
This is a bit big for an empty explanation. You're adding a lot of
unexplained debug statements, but your own words in the comment seem to
be the best changelog:
> + * lpfc_sli4_unreg_rpi_cmpl_clr - mailbox completion handler
> + * @phb
On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 14:24 -0500, James Smart wrote:
> ---
> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hw4.h | 5 -
> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c | 39 +++
> 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hw4.h b/drivers/scsi/l
On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 14:23 -0500, James Smart wrote:
> ---
This one really requires more than a one-line explanation because the
one liner doesn't really describe what you've done.
It looks like the description should be:
Only the SLI rev 4 card has a host reset capability, so only activate it
On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 14:23 -0500, James Smart wrote:
> ---
Could you put the signoffs (and any changelog) above here, please. You
seem to be using git to generate the patches, so if you just put them in
the git change log the right thing will happen. If you don't do this,
all your patches have
> "Sudip" == Sudip Mukherjee writes:
Sudip> we were dereferencing sdkp first and then we were checking for it
Sudip> being NULL.
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=142564395705827&w=2
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsub
6 matches
Mail list logo
