What do these commands report about the NUMA and non-uniform IO topology on the
test system?
numactl --hardware
lspci -t
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Moyer [mailto:jmo...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, 12 November, 2012 3:27 PM
> To: Bart Van Assche
> Cc: Elliott, Rober
Bart Van Assche writes:
> On 11/09/12 21:46, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>>> On 11/06/12 16:41, Elliott, Robert (Server Storage) wrote:
It's certainly better to tie them all to one node then let them be
randomly scattered across nodes; your 6% observation may simply be
from that.
H
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Alan.
>
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 02:18:11PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > Weren't you gonna do something different about this? I mean, if sr
> > > knows that autopm kicked in, it can simply tell the block layer that
> > > nothing is going on. Wou
Hello, Alan.
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 02:18:11PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > Weren't you gonna do something different about this? I mean, if sr
> > knows that autopm kicked in, it can simply tell the block layer that
> > nothing is going on. Wouldn't that be simpler?
>
> It wouldn't work for no
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 02:51:59PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > A new interface to block disk events is added, this interface is
> > meant to eliminate a race between PM runtime callback and disk events
> > checking.
> >
> > Suppose the following device tree:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 02:51:59PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> A new interface to block disk events is added, this interface is
> meant to eliminate a race between PM runtime callback and disk events
> checking.
>
> Suppose the following device tree:
> device_sata_port (the parent)
> device_ODD
Hello,
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 02:51:58PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> @@ -784,7 +784,13 @@ static int ata_acpi_push_id(struct ata_device *dev)
> */
> int ata_acpi_on_suspend(struct ata_port *ap)
> {
> - /* nada */
> + struct ata_device *dev;
> +
> + ata_for_each_dev(dev, &ap->link, EN
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 02:51:57PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> The atapi_eh_tur and atapi_eh_request_sense can be reused by ZPODD
> code, so separate them out to a file named libata-atapi.c, and the
> Makefile is modified accordingly. No functional changes should result
> from this commit.
Why is thi
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 02:51:56PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> Since the ata acpi notification code introduced in commit
> 3bd46600a7a7e938c54df8cdbac9910668c7dfb0 is solely for ZPODD, and we
> now have a dedicated place for it, move these code there.
>
> And the add/remove_pm_notifier code is simpli
Hello,
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 02:51:55PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> void ata_acpi_unbind(struct ata_device *dev)
> {
> + if (zpodd_dev_enabled(dev))
> + zpodd_deinit(dev);
Maybe zpodd_exit() instead?
> +void zpodd_init(struct ata_device *dev)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + struct
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 12/11/2012 16:10, James Bottomley ha scritto:
> >> Actually it only turns it on for large capacity drives, as said in the
> >> comment. sdp->force_read_16 only matters for >2TB drives:
> >
> > If you follow the discussion, we'll need to turn it on
Il 12/11/2012 16:10, James Bottomley ha scritto:
>> Actually it only turns it on for large capacity drives, as said in the
>> comment. sdp->force_read_16 only matters for >2TB drives:
>
> If you follow the discussion, we'll need to turn it on for some drives
> regardless of size.
Even if the tw
On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 10:01 -0500, Jason J. Herne wrote:
> > Any reason not to do this always on >2TB drives, which basically means
> > changing this:
> >
> > - } else if (block > 0x) {
> > + } else if (sdkp->capacity > 0x) {
> >
> > and nothing else?
>
> This was the i
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:10 AM, James Bottomley
wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 15:31 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 12/11/2012 12:33, James Bottomley ha scritto:
>> > On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 11:08 -0500, Jason J. Herne wrote:
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c
>> >> b/drivers/usb
Bart Van Assche writes:
> On 11/09/12 20:18, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>> -cmd = kmem_cache_zalloc(pool->cmd_slab, gfp_mask | pool->gfp_mask);
>> +cmd = kmem_cache_alloc_node(pool->cmd_slab,
>> +gfp_mask | pool->gfp_mask | __GFP_ZERO,
>> +
On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 15:31 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 12/11/2012 12:33, James Bottomley ha scritto:
> > On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 11:08 -0500, Jason J. Herne wrote:
> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c
> >> b/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c
> >> index 13b8bcd..6ff785e 100644
> >> ---
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 12/11/2012 12:33, James Bottomley ha scritto:
>> On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 11:08 -0500, Jason J. Herne wrote:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c
>>> b/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c
>>> index 13b8bcd..6ff785e 100644
>>> --- a/driv
Il 12/11/2012 12:33, James Bottomley ha scritto:
> On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 11:08 -0500, Jason J. Herne wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c
>> b/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c
>> index 13b8bcd..6ff785e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/storage/scsigl
Lawrence Rosen wrote at 17:13 (EST) on Sunday:
> First, I hope that we can tone down the arguments about whether the
> use of Linux APIs and headers automatically turns a program into a
> derivative work of Linux. I think that argument has been largely
> debunked in the U.S. in the recent decision
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 09:08:43 -0500
"Theodore Ts'o" wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 10:15:02AM -0500, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
> > Andy's initial email ended with the request: "Please explain." Thus,
> > Andy's email seemed designed to seek facts, which I think is a
> > reasonable and good thing t
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 10:15:02AM -0500, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
> Andy's initial email ended with the request: "Please explain." Thus,
> Andy's email seemed designed to seek facts, which I think is a
> reasonable and good thing to do here. Meanwhile, the facts *still*
> aren't clear here yet.
.
On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 11:08 -0500, Jason J. Herne wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c
> b/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c
> index 13b8bcd..6ff785e 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c
> @@ -251,6 +251,11 @@ static int slave_configure(s
On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 16:33 +, Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
wrote:
> I recommend broadening this patch. T10 is discussing making READ
> (10), WRITE (10), etc. obsolete in SBC-4 in favor of their 16-byte CDB
> counterparts.
>
> The algorithm should be:
> 1. During discovery, determine if
On Nov 11 Stefan Richter wrote:
> On Nov 09 Elliott, Robert (Server Storage) wrote:
> > I recommend broadening this patch. T10 is discussing making READ (10),
> > WRITE (10), etc. obsolete in SBC-4 in favor of their 16-byte CDB
> > counterparts.
> >
> > The algorithm should be:
> > 1. During
24 matches
Mail list logo
