On 09/26/2012 07:02 PM, Robert Love wrote:
This patch adds support for the new fcoe_sysfs
control interface to bnx2fc.ko. It keeps the deprecated
interface in tact and therefore either the legacy
or the new control interfaces can be used. A mixed mode
is not supported. A user must either use the
On 09/30/2012 03:43 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012, Jeff Garzik wrote:
The simple fact of "only ZPODD devices out there are ATA" is not the
decision-maker for where the code should live. It is more a question
where ZPODD belongs in the device/command set model currently employed.
Hi James,
Do you have any update with regards to the review of this driver? You
were mentioning about getting FC folks to take a look at it.
Thanks,
Naresh.
On 9/24/2012 10:47 PM, Naresh Kumar Inna wrote:
> This is the initial submission of the Chelsio FCoE offload driver (csiostor)
> to the ups
Am Sonntag 30 September 2012, 13:07:54 schrieb Paul Bolle:
> Compiling qla_gs.o (part of the qla2xxx module) triggers two GCC
> warnings:
> drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.c: In function ‘qla2x00_fdmi_rhba’:
> drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.c:1339:7: warning: array subscript is above
> array bound
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> The simple fact of "only ZPODD devices out there are ATA" is not the
> decision-maker for where the code should live. It is more a question
> where ZPODD belongs in the device/command set model currently employed.
I don't really accept this argument.
On 09/30/2012 10:47 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
Makes sense to me, but there is a problem if I want to block events
checking for the disk, as I do not have a pointer to the gendisk in ATA
layer.
You may discover the gendisk by going the ATA -> SCSI -> block rout
On 09/29/2012 06:44 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Saturday, September 29, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
On 09/29/2012 10:29 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
I don't think this is a good idea, quite frankly. sr seems to be a too
generic place for that.
Does this mean sr
On 09/29/2012 06:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Saturday, September 29, 2012, Alan Stern wrote:
Can arbitrary SCSI devices be ZP, or does this notion apply only to
ATAPI-based drives? That's the key question, and the answer determines
where the ZP support belongs.
I agree. That said for
On 09/27/12 04:01, Robert Love wrote:
+static ssize_t store_ctlr_enabled(struct device *dev,
+ struct device_attribute *attr,
+ const char *buf, size_t count)
+{
+ struct fcoe_ctlr_device *ctlr = dev_to_ctlr(dev);
+ int v
On 09/30/2012 10:47 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
>
>> Makes sense to me, but there is a problem if I want to block events
>> checking for the disk, as I do not have a pointer to the gendisk in ATA
>> layer.
>
>> The tray will be ejected by the ODD itself when it ha
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
> Makes sense to me, but there is a problem if I want to block events
> checking for the disk, as I do not have a pointer to the gendisk in ATA
> layer.
> The tray will be ejected by the ODD itself when it has power, I do not
> need to do that. Moreover, I don
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 12:27:41AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, September 29, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > [Adding more people and list back in]
> >
> > On 09/29/2012 05:46 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Friday, September 28, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > >> On 09/28/2012 07:15 A
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 12:44:50AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, September 29, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > On 09/29/2012 10:29 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > On Sat, 29 Sep 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > >
> > >>> I don't think this is a good idea, quite frankly. sr seems to be a too
> > >
Compiling qla_gs.o (part of the qla2xxx module) triggers two GCC
warnings:
drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.c: In function ‘qla2x00_fdmi_rhba’:
drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.c:1339:7: warning: array subscript is above
array bounds [-Warray-bounds]
drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.c: In function ‘q
14 matches
Mail list logo
