On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 21:06 +0200, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > So while this would work, I do wonder however whether we could
> instead
> > fix it by simplifying the whole thing as follow since iSeries is now
> > gone and so we don't need split backends anymore:
> >
> > scsi/ibmvscsi: Remove backend ab
Hi James,
Any chance of these patches get merged into 3.6?
Thanks,
Aaron
On 07/27/2012 05:00 PM, Aaron Lu wrote:
v4:
Rebase on top of Linus' tree, due to this, the problem of a missing
flag in v3 is gone;
Add a new function scsi_autopm_put_device_autosuspend to first mark
last busy for the dev
Hi Linus,
Here is the PULL request for the initial merge of tcm_vhost based on
RFC-v5 code with MST's ACK appended to the initial merge commit.
As promised, the commit is available from two different branches for you
to consider merging as for-3.6 code.
The 'for-next-merge' branch based on mainli
From: Nicholas Bellinger
This patch contains the post RFC-v5 (post-merge) changes, this includes:
- Add locking comment
- Move vhost_scsi_complete_cmd ahead of TFO callbacks in order to
drop forward declarations
- Drop extra '!= NULL' usage in vhost_scsi_complete_cmd_work()
- Change vhost_scsi
> I have 3.5 here and see the loop too, but it stops after a couple of seconds:
>
> first: KERNEL[15636.368034]
> last: KERNEL[15638.879796]
Ah, sorry then.
The udev messages reported by the udev monitor reported up to 20
seconds of udev (userspace) events. I did not filter kernel reported
message
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Markus Rathgeb
wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Do you remember?
> I get it again, is there something I could do?
>
> I attached a file that contains the "udevadm monitor" log.
>
> I am using a v3.5.0 linux kernel (containing some gentoo patches).
> Should I test it with a vani
Hello!
Do you remember?
I get it again, is there something I could do?
I attached a file that contains the "udevadm monitor" log.
I am using a v3.5.0 linux kernel (containing some gentoo patches).
Should I test it with a vanilla one?
Here the versions of some packages (kernel, udev, systemd):
s
On Mon, Jul 30, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 18:49 +0200, o...@aepfle.de wrote:
> > From: Olaf Hering
> >
> > The driver is named ibmvscsic, at runtime it its name is advertised as
> > ibmvscsi. For this reason mkinitrd wont pickup the driver properly.
> > Reported by IB
On 07/30/2012 03:16 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> We recently changed the locking in this function, but this return was
> missed. It needs an unlock and the IRQs need to be restored.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter
> ---
Thanks for catching this.
Acked-by: Brian King
--
Brian King
Power Linux
On 07/30/2012 03:18 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> "rc" is always zero here, so there is no need to check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter
Thanks!
Acked-by: Brian King
--
Brian King
Power Linux I/O
IBM Linux Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lin
On 07/30/2012 10:12 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 30/07/2012 01:50, Rusty Russell ha scritto:
>>> Also, being the first user of chained scatterlist doesn't exactly give
>>> me warm fuzzies.
>>
>> We're far from the first user: they've been in the kernel for well over
>> 7 years. They were introdu
"rc" is always zero here, so there is no need to check.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ipr.c b/drivers/scsi/ipr.c
index 7a5ccb2c..fc49f17 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ipr.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ipr.c
@@ -5847,7 +5847,7 @@ static int ipr_queuecommand(struct Scsi_Host *shost,
We recently changed the locking in this function, but this return was
missed. It needs an unlock and the IRQs need to be restored.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter
---
Applies to linux-next.
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ipr.c b/drivers/scsi/ipr.c
index 07b14ba..7a5ccb2c 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ipr.c
Il 30/07/2012 08:25, Wang Sen ha scritto:
> When using the commands below to write some data to a virtio-scsi LUN of the
> QEMU guest(32-bit) with 1G physical memory(qemu -m 1024), the qemu will crash.
>
> # sudo mkfs.ext4 /dev/sdb (/dev/sdb is the virtio-scsi LUN.)
> # sudo mount
Il 30/07/2012 01:50, Rusty Russell ha scritto:
>> Also, being the first user of chained scatterlist doesn't exactly give
>> me warm fuzzies.
>
> We're far from the first user: they've been in the kernel for well over
> 7 years. They were introduced for the block layer, but they tended to
> ignore
15 matches
Mail list logo