Andrew wrote:
> (Note: I consider it blatantly incorrect to send a reply both to a
> mailing list and directly to the address of someone who is subscribed to
> that list
Regardless of how you consider it, that is how responding to these big
lists -must- work.
There is no practical way for respond
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [PATCH] scsi_debug: disable clustering
scsi_debug does at several places:
for_each_sg(sdb->table.sgl, sg, sdb->table.nents, k) {
kaddr = (unsigned char *)
kmap_atomic(sg_page(sg), KM_USER0);
We c
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 08:12:40PM -0500, Andrew Buehler wrote:
> [...] and I would not be in the least surprised if this turned out to
> be yet one more problem with gmail
It is; Gmail will refuse to POP more than one copy of a mail to you,
no matter how many copies it recieves via different path
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
> Messages sent to my address directly are explicitly not filtered into
> the folders I have set up for various mailing lists, so that if someone
> does send me a "heads up" reply for a specific topic on a list to which
> I am subscribed it does not get c
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9775
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|
Thanks James. I'll give a try tonight or tomorrow.
-J
--
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 11:37:41PM +, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Daniel Drake wrote:
>> Here is a patch to address your comments.
>> Joshua, would you mind testing this before I submit it properly? It will
>> apply cleanly to 2.6.24 on top
On 2/16/2008 6:11 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
For another, getting two copies of a message is no big deal --
I disagree.
Everyone has his own taste. Obviously there's no world-wide
consensus, possibly because different people have different workflow
ha
Daniel Drake wrote:
Here is a patch to address your comments.
Joshua, would you mind testing this before I submit it properly? It will
apply cleanly to 2.6.24 on top of the previous patch you tested. I have
compile-tested it.
It would help to include the patch.
>From 0a9cd6133fe4f0c3a8906d6be
James Bottomley wrote:
On Sat, 2008-02-16 at 11:49 +, Daniel Drake wrote:
I assume you're aware that this patch is just a subset of commit
76d78300a6eb8 which you've already pushed up to Linus. Adding Nick Cheng
(commit author) to CC so that he can go over the feedback.
Well, in case it's
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
> > For another, getting two copies of a message is no big deal --
>
> I disagree.
Everyone has his own taste. Obviously there's no world-wide consensus,
possibly because different people have different workflow habits and so
are affected by duplicate
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
> (Note: I consider it blatantly incorrect to send a reply both to a
> mailing list and directly to the address of someone who is subscribed to
> that list unless you have reason to believe that that someone will not
> see the message otherwise, but in th
(Note: I consider it blatantly incorrect to send a reply both to a
mailing list and directly to the address of someone who is subscribed to
that list unless you have reason to believe that that someone will not
see the message otherwise, but in this case I am doing so anyway because
I see no way t
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:57:37AM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> I still don't have a card for testing myself. Again anyone
> wants to send me a card. Intel people anybody home?
Apparently Intel sold this line of cards to Adaptec. The copyright
notice in the file backs this up:
* Copyright (C) 1
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Oliver Pinter wrote:
> On 2/15/08, Andrew Buehler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In my workplace, I use a customized version of Novell's ZENworks imaging
> > boot CD, which is based off of Linux. I have one particular model of
> > laptop - the IBM/Lenovo R61 - on which three d
Jarod Wilson wrote on 2008-02-10:
> Now *this* does the trick. I get the 'READ CAPACITY failed' as before,
> then 'firewire_sbp2: fw1.0: error status: 0:4', followed by a new login and
> SCSI probe, both of which are successful this time, disk is available for use
> and all that good stuff.
FYI
From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [PATCH] scsi_debug: disable clustering
scsi_debug does at several places:
for_each_sg(sdb->table.sgl, sg, sdb->table.nents, k) {
kaddr = (unsigned char *)
kmap_atomic(sg_page(sg), KM_USER0);
We cannot do something like t
On Sat, 2008-02-16 at 11:49 +, Daniel Drake wrote:
> I assume you're aware that this patch is just a subset of commit
> 76d78300a6eb8 which you've already pushed up to Linus. Adding Nick Cheng
> (commit author) to CC so that he can go over the feedback.
Well, in case it's not obvious by now
add CC (Andrew, Greg and linux-usb)
On 2/15/08, Andrew Buehler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In my workplace, I use a customized version of Novell's ZENworks imaging
> boot CD, which is based off of Linux. I have one particular model of
> laptop - the IBM/Lenovo R61 - on which three different thing
I assume you're aware that this patch is just a subset of commit
76d78300a6eb8 which you've already pushed up to Linus. Adding Nick Cheng
(commit author) to CC so that he can go over the feedback.
James Bottomley wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/arcmsr/arcmsr_hba.c b/drivers/scsi/arcmsr/arcmsr
19 matches
Mail list logo
