Re: Performance of SCST versus STGT

2008-01-21 Thread Bart Van Assche
On Jan 22, 2008 4:26 AM, FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > First, I recommend you to examine iSER stuff more since it has some > parameters unlike SRP, which effects the performance, IIRC. At least, > you could get the iSER performances similar to Pete's. Documentation about configurin

[PATCH 5/6] scsi : use class iteration api

2008-01-21 Thread Dave Young
Convert to use the class iteration api. Signed-off-by: Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/scsi/hosts.c | 24 +--- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff -upr linux/drivers/scsi/hosts.c linux.new/drivers/scsi/hosts.c --- linux/drivers/scsi/hosts.c

Re: [PATCH v3] use dynamically allocated sense buffer

2008-01-21 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:37:41 -0700 Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 01:08:58PM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 09:40:11 -0700 > > Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Longer-term, I want to allow low-level drivers to allocate the

Re: Performance of SCST versus STGT

2008-01-21 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:36:18 +0100 "Bart Van Assche" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 18, 2008 1:08 PM, Vladislav Bolkhovitin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > [ ... ] > > So, seems I understood your slides correctly: the more valuable data for > > our SCST SRP vs STGT iSER comparison should b

Re: INITIO scsi driver fails to work properly

2008-01-21 Thread Alan Cox
Ok my attempt to get the card failed so we are going to have to do this the hard way. See where this patch crashes and what it prints (On top of the other patches) diff -u --new-file --recursive --exclude-from /usr/src/exclude linux.vanilla-2.6.24-rc8-mm1/drivers/scsi/initio.c linux-2.6.24-rc8-

Re: sym53c8xx ISTAT1 feature never set

2008-01-21 Thread Mike Anderson
Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The only problem is ... we never set the FE_ISTAT1 bit. Mike tells me > that when he sets it, it makes his error recovery work. > > I think we need a patch somewhat along these lines: > > {PCI_DEVICE_ID_LSI_53C1010_66, 0xff, "1010-66", 6, 31, 7, 8, >

Re: [PATCH] SCSI: fix isa/pcmcia compile problem

2008-01-21 Thread James Bottomley
On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 09:56 +, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 04:20:40PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > > aha152x.c and fdomain are built twice - once for the isa driver and > > once for the PCMCIA one. Through #ifdefs, the compiled codes are > > slightly different; thus, globa

Re: Performance of SCST versus STGT

2008-01-21 Thread Vladislav Bolkhovitin
Bart Van Assche wrote: On Jan 18, 2008 1:08 PM, Vladislav Bolkhovitin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [ ... ] So, seems I understood your slides correctly: the more valuable data for our SCST SRP vs STGT iSER comparison should be on page 26 for 1 command read (~480MB/s, i.e. ~60% from Bart's result

Re: [PATCH] remove use_sg_chaining

2008-01-21 Thread Benny Halevy
On Jan. 21, 2008, 11:31 +0200, Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 21 2008, Boaz Harrosh wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 20 2008 at 22:59 +0200, James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 21:01 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: On Sun, Jan 20 2008, Jens Axboe wrote:

Re: [PATCH] remove use_sg_chaining

2008-01-21 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On Mon, Jan 21 2008 at 11:31 +0200, Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 21 2008, Boaz Harrosh wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 20 2008 at 22:59 +0200, James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 21:01 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: On Sun, Jan 20 2008, Jens Axboe wr

Re: [PATCH] SCSI: fix isa/pcmcia compile problem

2008-01-21 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 04:20:40PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > aha152x.c and fdomain are built twice - once for the isa driver and > once for the PCMCIA one. Through #ifdefs, the compiled codes are > slightly different; thus, global symbols need to be given different > names depending on which flavo

Re: [PATCH] remove use_sg_chaining

2008-01-21 Thread Jens Axboe
On Mon, Jan 21 2008, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > On Sun, Jan 20 2008 at 22:59 +0200, James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 21:01 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: > >> On Sun, Jan 20 2008, Jens Axboe wrote: > >>> On Sun, Jan 20 2008, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > On Sun, Jan 20 2008 at

Re: [PATCH] remove use_sg_chaining

2008-01-21 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On Sun, Jan 20 2008 at 22:59 +0200, James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 21:01 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 20 2008, Jens Axboe wrote: >>> On Sun, Jan 20 2008, Boaz Harrosh wrote: On Sun, Jan 20 2008 at 21:29 +0200, Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: