On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 13:05:39 +0530
Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> [snip]
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Can you try this?
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/iommu-helper.c b/lib/iommu-helper.c
> > index e7d8544..495575a 100644
> > --- a/lib/iommu-helper.c
> > +++ b/lib/iommu-
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
[snip]
> Thanks,
>
> Can you try this?
>
>
> diff --git a/lib/iommu-helper.c b/lib/iommu-helper.c
> index e7d8544..495575a 100644
> --- a/lib/iommu-helper.c
> +++ b/lib/iommu-helper.c
> @@ -8,15 +8,20 @@
> static unsigned long find_next_zero_area(unsigned long *map,
>
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 11:15:37 +0530
Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 10:08:25 +0530
> > Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 10:18:50 +0530
> >>> Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
>
> Mike, what's going on? I definitely told you last time I
> looked at this patch that it is a bug to call
> sysfs_remove_group() under spinlock, because
> sysfs_remove_group() takes sleeping locks. Yet here it is again.
>
> Maybe you lost my email. It is here:
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/2
On Thursday 27 December 2007 13:09:27 FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 11:27:40 +1100
>
> Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There are many signs through the code that it needs a great deal of
> > work: what is the purpose of sg_break? Why does the code check if
> > kmap_atomi
5 matches
Mail list logo