Kay Sievers wrote:
> Is the udev daemon (still) running while it fails?
Yes, and there's something else I forgot to mention that may be
significant... For the bad case, in addition to udevd, "ps -ef"
shows a "sh -e /lib/udev/net.agent" running with a PPID of 1. This
process doesn't exit until I
Kay Sievers wrote:
> Is the udev daemon (still) running while it fails?
Yes.
> If you run /sbin/udevtrigger, do the nodes appear?
No. Exit status is 0, and there are no errors. Everything looks
fine under /sys/block, and there doesn't seem to be a problem with
/proc/devices either.
--
--
On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 09:51 -0500, Tony Battersby wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am sending this message to check up on the merge status of my recent
> sym53c8xx patches to make sure they aren't forgotten. Matthew Wilcox,
> could you give an ack/nak for these merge requests? Also, please let me
> know i
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 03:05:37PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:44:45 +
> Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I am not sure if this problem has been addressed already. I read some
> > about the fast-fail issues and this may be related?
> >
> > On nearly all my U
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:44:45 +
Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am not sure if this problem has been addressed already. I read some
> about the fast-fail issues and this may be related?
>
> On nearly all my USB block devices, I have been getting zillions of I/O
> errors. But they are
On Dec 6, 2007 6:07 PM, Gabriele Gorla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> disable packing of the TAG_TW_Device_Extension
> structure to prevent kernel unaligned accesses when
> accessing the spinlock inside the ioctl_wqueue structure.
> Fixes smartmontools kernel panic on alpha SMP
>
> Signed-off-by: Gab
Kay Sievers wrote:
> Yeah, that looks all fine.
>
> What distro is that, and what's the udev version?
Mine is Debian Etch, normally with the latest released or -rcX kernel
from kernel.org. Updates current as of about 18 hours ago. Udev
package version is 0.105-4. The RELEASE-NOTES file in /usr
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 10:36:23PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> subdir-y|m isn't supposed to contain modules or built-in components.
>> Change subdir-$(CONFIG_PCMCIA) to obj-$(CONFIG_PCMCIA).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi Matthew,
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 12:47:56 -0700
Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 07:39:53PM +, Nick Warne wrote:
> > I try not to build a modular kernel, but only have modules ON due to
> > nVidia (sigh). So I was semi-surprised when I saw the
> > scsi_wait_s
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 09:43 +1300, Michael Cree wrote:
> Bob Tracy wrote:
> > That was quick :-). Backing out the sysctl_check.c diff gives me a
> > working kernel. Beats the [EMAIL PROTECTED] out of me how/why, though.
> >
> > Michael Cree: could you try backing out the diff below from your
> >
Bob Tracy wrote:
That was quick :-). Backing out the sysctl_check.c diff gives me a
working kernel. Beats the [EMAIL PROTECTED] out of me how/why, though.
Michael Cree: could you try backing out the diff below from your
2.6.24-rc3 tree and see if things are now working for you?
Yes (conferen
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 07:39:53PM +, Nick Warne wrote:
> I try not to build a modular kernel, but only have modules ON due to
> nVidia (sigh). So I was semi-surprised when I saw the scsi_wait_scan
> module being built again, yet NO WHERE in menuconfig is it present to
> turn OFF. Even if I h
Hi all,
Please see below.
Nick
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 19:12:42 +
From: Nick Warne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: scsi_wait_scan Kconfig option
Hi all,
I am bringing this up again - primarily as I forgot about it after
patching my build tree a
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 10:35 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 13:14:22 -0500 Lee Schermerhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 13:20 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 11:36:39 -0500
> > > Lee Schermerhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
>
Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 19:06 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > i'm not sure how to do direct debugging on udev, so i can only guess
> > about what effect on the kernel side could have caused this. One bad
> > hack would be to "probe" udevd's behavior by changing the NET_TR entry
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 19:06 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Bob Tracy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > * Bob Tracy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Current state of the source tree is the 6f37ac... version, so I'll
> > > > > start backing out the above dif
* Bob Tracy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Bob Tracy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > Current state of the source tree is the 6f37ac... version, so I'll
> > > > start backing out the above diffs in related groups and continue
> > > > until I've got a working k
>Rob Love wrote:
>> Joe Eykholt wrote:
>>> [PATCH] Performance improvement, combine received data copy with
CRC.
>>>
>> Shouldn't we remove openfc_cp_to_user() if we're moving that
>> functionality into openfc_scsi_recv_data()?
>
>Yes. That was an oversight. I did intend to remove it.
>Do you wa
Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Bob Tracy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Current state of the source tree is the 6f37ac... version, so I'll
> > > start backing out the above diffs in related groups and continue
> > > until I've got a working kernel. For lack of an obvious target,
> > > I'll star
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 10:36:23PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> subdir-y|m isn't supposed to contain modules or built-in components.
> Change subdir-$(CONFIG_PCMCIA) to obj-$(CONFIG_PCMCIA).
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: James Bottomley
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
> > For one thing, you've using retries to control both an outer loop and
> > an inner loop -- meaning the total number of attempts could be on the
> > order of retries**2.
>
> Sort of; however, there should only really be one cc/ua before the TUR
> go
* Bob Tracy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Current state of the source tree is the 6f37ac... version, so I'll
> > start backing out the above diffs in related groups and continue
> > until I've got a working kernel. For lack of an obvious target,
> > I'll start with the seemingly innocuous ch
This patch converts calgary IOMMU to use the IOMMU helper
functions. The IOMMU doesn't allocate a memory area spanning LLD's
segment boundary anymore.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/x86/Kconfig |3 +++
arch/x86/kernel/pci-calgary_64.c | 34 ++
This kills unused __clear_bit_string and find_next_zero_string (they
were used by only gart and calgary IOMMUs).
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/x86/lib/Makefile_64|2 +-
arch/x86/lib/bitstr_64.c| 28
include/asm-x86/bitops_64
This adds IOMMU helper functions for the free area management. These
functions take care of LLD's segment boundary limit for IOMMUs. They
would be useful for IOMMUs that use bitmap for the free area
management.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/linux/iommu-helper.h |
This patch converts gart IOMMU to use the IOMMU helper functions. The
IOMMU doesn't allocate a memory area spanning LLD's segment boundary
anymore.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/x86/Kconfig |2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/pci-gart_64.c | 41
This patchset is a sequel to my patchset to fix iommu segment boundary
problems:
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org/msg11919.html
This adds new IOMMU helper functions for the free area
management. These functions take care of LLD's segment boundary limit
for IOMMUs. They are u
This patch converts PPC's IOMMU to use the IOMMU helper functions. The
IOMMU doesn't allocate a memory area spanning LLD's segment boundary
anymore.
iseries_hv_alloc and iseries_hv_map don't have proper device
struct. 4GB boundary is used for them.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Previously, during initialization of the IOMMU tables, the last entry
at each 4GB boundary is marked as used since there are many adapters
which cannot handle DMAing across any 4GB boundary.
The IOMMU doesn't allocate a memory area spanning LLD's segment
boundary anymore. The segment boundary of d
I wrote:
> "git diff 2f1f53bdc6531696934f6ee7bbdfa2ab4f4f62a3
> 6f37ac793d6ba7b35d338f791974166f67fdd9ba"
> produced a relatively short patch (18,437 bytes). The list of involved
> files:
>
> (omitted)
>
> Current state of the source tree is the 6f37ac... version, so I'll start
> backing out the
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 23:07:08 -0600 (CST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Tracy) wrote:
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > commit 6f37ac793d6ba7b35d338f791974166f67fdd9ba
> > > Merge: 2f1f53b... d90bf5a...
> > > Author: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Date: Wed Nov 14 18:51:48 20
subdir-y|m isn't supposed to contain modules or built-in components.
Change subdir-$(CONFIG_PCMCIA) to obj-$(CONFIG_PCMCIA).
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/scsi/Makefile |2 +-
1 file change
Hello Andrew,
thanks for your help!
On Friday 07 December 2007 02:09:11 Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 21:44:54 +0100
>
> Bernd Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > after scsi-recovery a system here went into some kind lock-up, everything
> > seems to be in wait_for_completion(). Pl
* Bob Tracy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm struggling to see how any of those could have broken block
> > device mounting on alpha. Are you sure you bisected right?
>
> Based on what's in that commit, it *does* appear something went wrong
> with bisection. If the implicated commit is the
* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > then the test of whether I bisected correctly is as simple as
> > applying the commit and seeing if things break, because I'm running
> > on the kernel corresponding to
> > 2f1f53bdc6531696934f6ee7bbdfa2ab4f4f62a3 right now. Let me give
> > that
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 23:07:08 -0600 (CST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Tracy) wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > commit 6f37ac793d6ba7b35d338f791974166f67fdd9ba
> > Merge: 2f1f53b... d90bf5a...
> > Author: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Wed Nov 14 18:51:48 2007 -0800
> >
> > Merge bran
* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > # bad: [6f37ac793d6ba7b35d338f791974166f67fdd9ba] Merge branch 'master' of
> > master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-2.6
> > git-bisect bad 6f37ac793d6ba7b35d338f791974166f67fdd9ba
> > # good: [2f1f53bdc6531696934f6ee7bbdfa2ab4f4f62a
37 matches
Mail list logo
