Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>> git-scsi-misc.patch
>
> Apologies for not looking into the problem earlier. See
> http://marc.info/?t=11962802235&r=1&w=2
> "2.6.24-rc3-mm2: Result: hostbyte=0x01 driverbyte=0x00\nend_request: I/O
> error"
> for previous installment.
>
> I've bisected it to the fol
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> akpm reported that:
> make mrproper
> make allmodconfig
> make drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/
>
> were broken in recent kbuild.git - and as a logical consequence
> removed kbuild.git from his -mm lineup.
>
> I have now fixed it (stupid bug I made) and pushed out
> a fresh kbuild.git
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 14:49:37 +0900 FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > drivers/scsi/dpt_i2o.c | 132 ++-
> > > drivers/scsi/dpti.h|9 ++
> > > 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
> >
> > I've done the following:
> >
> > -u
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 11:14:41 +0100
Anders Henke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 10:30:54 +0900 FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 17:11:55 -0800
> > > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 16:10:54 + (GMT)
> The esp_reset_cleanup() function is called with the host lock held and
> invokes starget_for_each_device() which wants to take it too. Here is a
> fix along the lines of shost_for_each_device()/__shost_f
Hi Boaz,
On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 15:39:12 +0200, Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 01 2007 at 1:35 +0200, Kiyoshi Ueda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This patch converts bidi of scsi mid-layer to use blk_end_request().
> >
> > rq->next_rq represents a pair of bidi requests.
> > (T
> git-scsi-misc.patch
Apologies for not looking into the problem earlier. See
http://marc.info/?t=11962802235&r=1&w=2
"2.6.24-rc3-mm2: Result: hostbyte=0x01 driverbyte=0x00\nend_request: I/O error"
for previous installment.
I've bisected it to the following patch in git-scsi-misc branch.
Rev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
>
> gdb stex.o
> l *stex_mu_intr+0x10e
>
> That will give you the exact line that failed
>
> Greeting,
>
> Eike
Well I get this:
raidology:~# gdb stex.o
...
(gdb) l *stex_mu_intr+0x10e
No symbol table is loaded. Use the "
On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 13:20 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 11:36:39 -0500
> Lee Schermerhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > As reported here:
> >
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=119645761124683&w=4
> >
> > against 24-rc3-mm2, I'm still seeing the hang on my HP ia64
Sean Rendell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering if someone knows how to debug this. I have a HP xw4300 PC
> with 2G RAM and 3GHz P4. Included is a Promise EX8350 RAID card with 4
> drives configured as RAID5. While doing some lengthy disk exercises (ie cp
> a 200G directory of files) the kerne
On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 11:36:39 -0500
Lee Schermerhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As reported here:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=119645761124683&w=4
>
> against 24-rc3-mm2, I'm still seeing the hang on my HP ia64 NUMA
> platform under 24-rc4-mm1 with async scsi scan enabled. I'm st
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I was wondering if someone knows how to debug this. I have a HP xw4300 PC with
2G RAM and 3GHz P4. Included is a
Promise EX8350 RAID card with 4 drives configured as RAID5. While doing some
lengthy disk exercises (ie cp a 200G
directory o
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 02:22:57PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > gdth driver is modified NOT to use scp->eh_timeout. Now, it has
> > eh_timed_out (gdth_timed_out) to handle command timeouts for locked
> > I/O's. Have not tested as I don't have needed h
Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ->timeout isn't used very much, so should not be too much work to
> console the two.
>
> If you see any specific obstacles, do list them!
I believe it is used in blk_add_timer() which may be called:
1) First time sending the command to LLDs
No problem. It
On Wed, Dec 05 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > This one fixes the 4-byte hole. Thank you very much.
> >
> > That's all fine, but now we have two fields doing essentially the same
> > thing. Care to cleanup the ->timeout usage so we can get by with using
>
Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > This one fixes the 4-byte hole. Thank you very much.
>
> That's all fine, but now we have two fields doing essentially the same
> thing. Care to cleanup the ->timeout usage so we can get by with using
> just that field?
I added another field because I could
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> Hi Alen
>
> Yes, I have not inspected sr.c very carefully, you are absolutely right.
> Could you submit a unified patch for sd, sr and scsi.c I have hit this
> bug 2 in my error injection tests. I was doing sg_chaining tests and now
> with the possibly v
Current progress: 11 revisions left to test. The current partial
"git bisect log" is available per Ingo's suggestion on bugzilla.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9457
--
Bob Tracy | "They couldn't hit
As reported here:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=119645761124683&w=4
against 24-rc3-mm2, I'm still seeing the hang on my HP ia64 NUMA
platform under 24-rc4-mm1 with async scsi scan enabled. I'm still
seeing the message "mptspi: ioc#: mpt_config failed" when it hangs.
I can boot by d
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Just wondering:
>
>>From my quick reading of the code these pre-T11 frames are basically
> a different frame-level protocol. Given that T11 has standardized
> on a different one what's the rationale for supporting the old frames?
There is still some use in lab environm
Currently the vscsi client driver responds to the case where H_SEND_CRQ
returns H_DROPPED by returning DID_ERROR. If the server CRQ is full,
either from mismanaging the request_limit or problems on the server,
we should return SCSI_MLQUEUE_HOST_BUSY instead.
The places where we are calling send_s
The esp_reset_cleanup() function is called with the host lock held and
invokes starget_for_each_device() which wants to take it too. Here is a
fix along the lines of shost_for_each_device()/__shost_for_each_device()
adding a __starget_for_each_device() counterpart which assumes the lock
has a
On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 15:02 -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Dec 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> > Actually, the night train is a good place to do coding. I know this
> > compiles, but could someone check it out? It's the form I think we
> > should do, since the ASC/ASCQ codes for esoteric
Just wondering:
>From my quick reading of the code these pre-T11 frames are basically
a different frame-level protocol. Given that T11 has standardized
on a different one what's the rationale for supporting the old frames?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" i
Hi,
I need some help with device suspending or something similar to this.
Problem description: We have many many Infortrend sata-to-scsi-raid systems
here, connected to several server systems with LSI2230 HBAs.
Now the problem is, that these Infortrend boxes sometimes suffer from some
kind of h
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 10:30:54 +0900 FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 17:11:55 -0800
> > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 10:04:03 +0900
> > > FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
On Tue, Dec 04 2007, Kiyoshi Ueda wrote:
> Hi Boaz and Jens,
>
> On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 15:56:32 +0200, Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > +/**
> > > + * blk_end_request - Helper function for drivers to complete the request.
> > > + * @rq: the request being processed
> > > + * @uptod
On Tue, Dec 04 2007 at 20:03 +0200, Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2007, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>
>> perhaps below hunk should be added to your patch.
>
> It looks like a good idea.
>
>> Was it decided when this data corruption bugfix is
>> merged.
>
> I don't know -- I have
28 matches
Mail list logo
