RE: [RFC] [PATCH 1/2] blk request timeout handler patches

2007-10-04 Thread Salyzyn, Mark
ACK for the trivial portion surrounding aacraid and ips! Sincerely -- Mark Salyzyn > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 2:18 PM > To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/2] blk request timeout handler patches

2007-10-04 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 11:17:50 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Mike Christie's patches refreshed to 2.6.23-rc8-mm1. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Signed-off-by: Malahal Naineni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > diff -r 3697367c6e4d block/ll_rw_blk.c > --- a/block/ll_rw_blk.c

Re: [RFC] [PATCH 2/2] blk request timeout handler patches

2007-10-04 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 11:20:03 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Fix scsi_dispatch_cmd() to stop timers. > > Signed-off-by: Malahal Naineni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > diff -r 870bb598c977 drivers/scsi/scsi.c > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi.c Thu Sep 27 00:25:38 2007 -0700 > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi.c

Re: [PATCH 2/2]: PCI Error Recovery: Symbios SCSI First Failure

2007-10-04 Thread Linas Vepstas
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 07:27:30PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > The thing to remember is that sym2 is in transition from being a dual > BSD/Linux driver to being a purely Linux driver. I was wondering about that; couldn't tell if the split in the code was historical, or being intentionally m

[RFC] [PATCH 2/2] blk request timeout handler patches

2007-10-04 Thread malahal
Fix scsi_dispatch_cmd() to stop timers. Signed-off-by: Malahal Naineni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -r 870bb598c977 drivers/scsi/scsi.c --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi.c Thu Sep 27 00:25:38 2007 -0700 +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi.c Thu Sep 27 01:04:10 2007 -0700 @@ -471,14 +471,19 @@ int scsi_dispatc

[RFC] [PATCH 1/2] blk request timeout handler patches

2007-10-04 Thread malahal
Mike Christie's patches refreshed to 2.6.23-rc8-mm1. Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Malahal Naineni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -r 3697367c6e4d block/ll_rw_blk.c --- a/block/ll_rw_blk.c Thu Sep 27 00:12:13 2007 -0700 +++ b/block/ll_rw_blk.c Thu Sep 27 00:13:07 2007

[RFC] [PATCH 0/2] blk request timeout handler patches

2007-10-04 Thread malahal
I refreshed the blk layer timeout patch from Mike Christie to 2.6.23-rc8-mm1. Fixed couple of places where scsi_dispatch_cmd() wasn't stopping timers. Thanks, Malahal. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordo

Re: [patch 02/17] PCI Error Recovery: Symbios SCSI base support

2007-10-04 Thread Linas Vepstas
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 03:49:26PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 02:38:00PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > From: Linas Vepstas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Various PCI bus errors can be signaled by newer PCI controllers. This > > patch adds the PCI error recovery call

[GIT PATCH] critical megaraid bug fix for 2.6.23

2007-10-04 Thread James Bottomley
This is a critical fix for the reported megaraid inability to boot: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/2/243 The patch is here: master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-rc-fixes-2.6.git And the description and diffstat: commit d5e89385e92a77b2764d9eb8284808a7628cb2a8 Author: FUJITA Tomo

SCSI runtime power management

2007-10-04 Thread Alan Stern
I'm trying to work out a simple framework for SCSI runtime management but am handicapped by lack of detailed knowledge of many of the nuances in the SCSI stack. Here's an initial proposal, modelled after the USB implementation: There are three reasons why a SCSI device might be suspended. The

Re: 2.6.23-rc9 boot failure (megaraid?)

2007-10-04 Thread James Bottomley
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 12:36 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Thu, Oct 04 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 09:28:34 +0200 > > Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Oct 04 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > > > On Wed, 3 Oct 2007 17:32:55 -0600 > > > > "Patro, Sumant"

Re: 2.6.23-rc9 boot failure (megaraid?)

2007-10-04 Thread Jens Axboe
On Thu, Oct 04 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 12:48:58 +0200 > Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 09:28:34AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > > >... > > > Tomo, this is the patch I added. > > > > Please excuse my comment in case this was already clea

Re: 2.6.23-rc9 boot failure (megaraid?)

2007-10-04 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 12:48:58 +0200 Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 09:28:34AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > >... > > Tomo, this is the patch I added. > > Please excuse my comment in case this was already clear: > > You are aware that this bug is a regression in 2.6.2

Re: 2.6.23-rc9 boot failure (megaraid?)

2007-10-04 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 09:28:34AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: >... > Tomo, this is the patch I added. Please excuse my comment in case this was already clear: You are aware that this bug is a regression in 2.6.23-rc and the patch should therefore go to Linus ASAP and not after the release of 2.6.2

Re: 2.6.23-rc9 boot failure (megaraid?)

2007-10-04 Thread Jens Axboe
On Thu, Oct 04 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 09:28:34 +0200 > Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 04 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > > On Wed, 3 Oct 2007 17:32:55 -0600 > > > "Patro, Sumant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---

Re: 2.6.23-rc9 boot failure (megaraid?)

2007-10-04 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 09:28:34 +0200 Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 04 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > On Wed, 3 Oct 2007 17:32:55 -0600 > > "Patro, Sumant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: FUJITA Tomonori [mailto:[E

Re: 2.6.23-rc9 boot failure (megaraid?)

2007-10-04 Thread Jens Axboe
On Thu, Oct 04 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > On Wed, 3 Oct 2007 17:32:55 -0600 > "Patro, Sumant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: FUJITA Tomonori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 5:01 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED