Alan Cox wrote:
> > As before, no problems using the sda hard disk (which is the boot drive):
> > everything works reliably until I touch the cdrom drive.
>
> A little quiet contemplation and gnome number 387 suggests trying the
> following
> (and providing more detailed information such as the l
James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 16:47 -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
> > I previously reported an ISA DMA issue for the 2.6.12 kernel. The issue
> > persists through at least 2.6.18. SCSI controller is an Adaptec
> > AHA-1542B (ISA).
> >
> > The action "mount -t iso9660 /dev/scd0 /mnt/cd
On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 16:47 -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
> I previously reported an ISA DMA issue for the 2.6.12 kernel. The issue
> persists through at least 2.6.18. SCSI controller is an Adaptec
> AHA-1542B (ISA).
>
> The action "mount -t iso9660 /dev/scd0 /mnt/cdrom -r"
>
> produces
>
> (cdrom d
> As before, no problems using the sda hard disk (which is the boot drive):
> everything works reliably until I touch the cdrom drive.
A little quiet contemplation and gnome number 387 suggests trying the following
(and providing more detailed information such as the last message printed before
th
From: Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 02:09:01 +0400
> irqreturn.h for irqreturn_t and dma_addr_t being u128 warnings ;-)
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'll apply this, thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s
irqreturn.h for irqreturn_t and dma_addr_t being u128 warnings ;-)
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c |9 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
#inc
Salyzyn, Mark wrote:
> As an option for a patch (later), what was the actual value of the
> Munit.OIMR register (on the x3550 and the x3650 please, just in case)?
0xF.
--D
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More ma
I previously reported an ISA DMA issue for the 2.6.12 kernel. The issue
persists through at least 2.6.18. SCSI controller is an Adaptec
AHA-1542B (ISA).
The action "mount -t iso9660 /dev/scd0 /mnt/cdrom -r"
produces
(cdrom detection messages as various modules autoload, then...)
sgpnt[0:1] pag
From: Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:16:58 +0100
> aic7xxx might not be the best driver to look at either :) In practice
> a softirq has short enough latency so this doesn't matter, but you
> should probably benchmark it on your hardware. 53x700.c which is
> the
Maybe we should consider something like:
dev->a_ops.adapter_sync_cmd = rx_sync_cmd;
dev->a_ops.adapter_enable_int = aac_rx_disable_interrupt;
-dev->OIMR = status = rx_readb (dev, MUnit.OIMR);
-if status & 0xff) != 0xff) || reset_devices) &&
+if (reset_
Salyzyn, Mark wrote:
> In my unit tests of aacraid_kexec_5.patch, restart was not called for
> normal operations. If you are just doing a normal boot, what conditions
> are causing restart to be called in your case? Is it a warm restart?
> Some kind of operation that leaves the Adapter in an initi
When the vport attribute "delete" is used to delete the vport, sysfs
deadlocks waiting for the write to complete, which is waiting for the
sysfs teardown to complete. Moved this effort to a work_q element.
Took the opportunity to make some other cosmetic changes:
- removed tabs in Doc file - repl
Sorry for the late reply. I'll stay in this thead despite the
new version beeing posted to not lose the context.
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 01:44:40PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> I did all of this, and it's fine, but there is one site which is much
> less pleasant, device reconnect.
>
> With the e
The repost does not change anything. It simply updates the patch so
it can be applied cleanly after the "make all rports wait dev_loss_tmo"
patch which was just posted.
--
This patch provides support for FC virtual ports based on NPIV.
For information on the interfaces and design, please read
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 10:55:54AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> > Personally, I don't like to see 2.4 and 2.6 in a new driver, and
> > will tend to try to force it to be 2.6 only. For an existing
> > driver, I tend to be much more tolerant: remo
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
> Personally, I don't like to see 2.4 and 2.6 in a new driver, and
> will tend to try to force it to be 2.6 only. For an existing
> driver, I tend to be much more tolerant: removing the huge gobs of
> code to achieve 2.6 only is usually a bit disruptive
Per the comment in the change - it's not always prudent to immediately
remove the rport upon first notice of a disconnect. Make all rports
wait dev_loss_tmo before being deleted (and each could have a separate
dev_loss_tmo value).
The original post was:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=11739219600
Just wait a second ...
We are not supposed to be calling aac_rx_restart_adapter unless the
Adapter has it's interrupts enabled (from a previous driver load in the
same warm session such as a kexec) or if the kernel reset_devices flag
is set (which is a mandatory kernel flag during kdump or kexec).
Reject, this is already covered in aacraid_kexec_5.patch and again
separately in aacraid_kexec_fix.patch.
Sincerely -- Mark Salyzyn
> -Original Message-
> From: Darrick J. Wong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 6:58 PM
> To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Salyz
On Apr 27 2007 01:24, David Miller wrote:
>> On Apr 27 2007 00:28, David Miller wrote:
>>
>> >This is the patch I intend to send to Linus via my
>> >sparc-2.6 tree.
>> >
>> >Thanks to everyone for the review and testing!
>> >
>> >commit cd9ad58d4061494e7fdd70ded7bcf2418daf356a
>> >Author: David S
From: Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:33:30 +0200 (MEST)
> Well the patch looks like it's done in one commit (rather than two -
> delete+add), but that's probably just because it's the diff over both commits.
I didn't do it in multiple commits, I did it in one.
If I
From: Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:57:34 +0200 (MEST)
>
> On Apr 27 2007 00:28, David Miller wrote:
>
> >This is the patch I intend to send to Linus via my
> >sparc-2.6 tree.
> >
> >Thanks to everyone for the review and testing!
> >
> >commit cd9ad58d4061494e7fdd7
On Apr 27 2007 00:28, David Miller wrote:
>This is the patch I intend to send to Linus via my
>sparc-2.6 tree.
>
>Thanks to everyone for the review and testing!
>
>commit cd9ad58d4061494e7fdd70ded7bcf2418daf356a
>Author: David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Thu Apr 26 21:19:23 2007 -0700
23 matches
Mail list logo
