(Sent to linux-kernel yesterday. Forgot to "Cc:" here.)
This showed up during a 2.6.21-rc7 build after I upgraded gcc from 3.3
to 3.4 on a Slackware system:
make -C drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aicasm
(...)
gcc -I/usr/include -I. aicasm.c aicasm_symbol.c aicasm_gram.c
aicasm_macro_gram.c aicasm_scan.c
From: "Seokmann Ju" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:28:07 -0700
> Hello David,
> On Mon 4/16/2007 10:02 PM, David Miller wrote:
> > > I'm in transit for a redeye to NY so I won't be able to modify the
> > > patch, If you would be amenable to the above, Seokmann, could you
> > > rew
Hello David,
On Mon 4/16/2007 10:02 PM, David Miller wrote:
> > I'm in transit for a redeye to NY so I won't be able to modify the
> > patch, If you would be amenable to the above, Seokmann, could you
> > rework the patch?
>
> Thanks guys.
Here, I've attached updated patch. Please take this.
Sor
On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 02:09 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> James, are you going to rebase scsi-misc-2.6 before sending to Linus
> when 2.6.22-rc1 window opens? If not, Jeff can pull it into libata-dev
> and patch 3 and 4 can go in there. The difference in libata between
> scsi-misc-2.6 and libata-dev
James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 11:20 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> then, unless there are dependencies in libata-dev, how about Tejun
>> pushes patches 3-4 through scsi-misc as well?
>
> Sure ... as long as there are no dependencies.
James, are you going to rebase scsi-misc-2.6 be
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 10:45 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> ACK patches 3-4 for upstream. I'm dropping them, and requesting resend
> when patches 1-2 are applied (which I also ACK). Or, alternately, I
> could apply all four patches with the other subsystem owner's assent, or
> the other subsystem
James Bottomley wrote:
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 10:45 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
ACK patches 3-4 for upstream. I'm dropping them, and requesting resend
when patches 1-2 are applied (which I also ACK). Or, alternately, I
could apply all four patches with the other subsystem owner's assent, or
the
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 11:20 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> then, unless there are dependencies in libata-dev, how about Tejun
> pushes patches 3-4 through scsi-misc as well?
Sure ... as long as there are no dependencies.
James
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi
Tejun Heo wrote:
Now that libata uses sd->manage_start_stop, libata spins down disk on
shutdown. In an attempt to compensate libata's previous shortcoming,
shutdown(8) syncs and spins down disks attached via libata. Some
disks spin back up just to spin down again on STANDBYNOW1 if the
command i
Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> Following are 4 (large) patches for support of bidirectional
>> block I/O in kernel. (not including SCSI-ml or iSCSI)
>>
>> The submitted work is against linux-2.6-block tree as of
>> 2007/04/15, and will only cleanly apply in succession.
>>
>> The pa
QLA1280: call pci_set_dma_mask with DMA_64BIT_MASK instead of ~ 0ULL
Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla1280.c b/drivers/scsi/qla1280.c
index 6777e8a..54d8bdf 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/qla1280.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/qla1280.c
@@ -4293,7 +4293,7 @
11 matches
Mail list logo
