Re: WRITE BUFFER commands through SG_IO getting rounded up to sector past 32k

2007-03-09 Thread Aravind Parchuri
FYI, commenting out the sector roundup in sg_build_indirect ( blk_size = (blk_size + SG_SECTOR_MSK) & (~SG_SECTOR_MSK); ) made everything work fine with my test and open-iscsi in general. I'm sure there's a glaringly obvious reason for that roundup (one that I'm unaware of), so I presume this i

Re: WRITE BUFFER commands through SG_IO getting rounded up to sector past 32k

2007-03-09 Thread Aravind Parchuri
My log messages were getting all mixed up, so I cleaned up my little test to send just one command at a time. It actually looks like the mid layer passes the command through to open-iscsi with the right size the first time, but then it sends a second command with request_bufflen = 0. I can ver

RE: [ PATCH ] mptsas: Fix oops for insmod during kexec

2007-03-09 Thread Moore, Eric
On Friday, March 09, 2007 2:23 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > This needs a much better explanation. Please show the codepath > leading to this. > > I was working with Judith on this patch earlier this week, so this is approved by LSI,,, ACK. This fix's an oops during driver load time. mpts

Re: [ PATCH ] mptsas: Fix oops for insmod during kexec

2007-03-09 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 01:07:44PM -0800, Judith Lebzelter wrote: > Hello, > > This patch is to fix an oops on insmod for mptsas during kexec. > This applies to 2.6.21-rc3. > > Signed-off-by: Judith Lebzelter <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --- > > > Index: linux-2.6.21-rc3/drivers/message/fusion/mpts

[ PATCH ] mptsas: Fix oops for insmod during kexec

2007-03-09 Thread Judith Lebzelter
Hello, This patch is to fix an oops on insmod for mptsas during kexec. This applies to 2.6.21-rc3. Signed-off-by: Judith Lebzelter <[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Index: linux-2.6.21-rc3/drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c === --- linux-2.6.2

Re: [stable] [patch 29/29] bug in gdth.c crashing machine

2007-03-09 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 07:50:14PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 11:16 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Achim did reply: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/23/138 > > Ah ... OK; sorry, I'm parochial ... if it didn't appear on linux-scsi, > you can usually assume I haven't seen it.

Re: [PATCH 1/3] pci: New PCI-E reset API

2007-03-09 Thread Brian King
Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 02:44:26PM -0600, Brian King wrote: >> Greg, >> >> I saw you pulled this into your gregkh-2.6 tree. Does that mean >> it is queued for 2.6.22? > > Yes it is. Is that a problem? No problem at all. Thanks, Brian -- Brian King eServer Storage I/O IBM Li

Re: qla2xxx BUG: workqueue leaked lock or atomic

2007-03-09 Thread Andre Noll
On 12:05, Mingming Cao wrote: > > > BTW: Are ext3 filesystem sizes greater than 8T now officially > > > supported? > > > > I think so, but I don't know how much 16TB testing developers and > > distros are doing - perhaps the linux-ext4 denizens can tell us? > > - > > IBM has done some testing (db