On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 03:12:51PM -0600, Mike Miller (OS Dev) wrote:
> Patch 2/2
>
> This patch adds reboot_notifier support to cciss. Changes in firmware make
> this patch
> essential. Without this patch there may be valid data left in the
> controller's battery
> backed write cache (BBWC) on
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:12:51 -0600 "Mike Miller (OS Dev)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> @@ -3293,6 +3327,12 @@ #endif
> ((hba[i]->nr_cmds + BITS_PER_LONG -
>1) / BITS_PER_LONG) * sizeof(unsigned long));
>
> + if (notify_count == 0) {
> + register_rebo
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:10:39 -0600 "Mike Miller (OS Dev)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Patch 1/2
>
> This patch changes the way we determine if a logical volume is larger than
> 2TB. The
> original test looked for a total_size of 0. Originally we added 1 to the
> total_size.
> That would make
I have JBOD in FL-port and if I unplug the cable or disable the switch
port, the qla2xxx driver doesn't fail the I/O soon. The remote port
status is 'online' all the time. The I/O's usually timeout after the
usual scsi timeout. Based on the existing structure, al_pa is at the
lowest addressed byte,
On Monday, February 19, 2007 10:19 AM, Malahal Naineni wrote:
> qla2xxx driver fails to handle RSCN events affecting area or
> domain due to an endian issue on big endian systems. This
> fixes the port_id_t structure on big endian systems.
Can you provide more details on the fails you are getti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Scarpa wrote:
First a very big thanks to all of u! I have been suffering a serious
lack of sleep problem lately.. i should have noticed that by whom has
been submitting the past 500 fixes and updates!
Quick question, is the driver still consider experimental??
Patch 2/2
This patch adds reboot_notifier support to cciss. Changes in firmware make this
patch
essential. Without this patch there may be valid data left in the controller's
battery
backed write cache (BBWC) on shutdown. We found out the hard way that the
kernel does
not call our cleanup routi
Patch 1/2
This patch changes the way we determine if a logical volume is larger than 2TB.
The
original test looked for a total_size of 0. Originally we added 1 to the
total_size.
That would make our read_capacity return size 0 for >2TB lv's. We assumed that
we
could not have a lv size of 0 so i
John Scarpa wrote:
> First a very big thanks to all of u! I have been suffering a serious
> lack of sleep problem lately.. i should have noticed that by whom has
> been submitting the past 500 fixes and updates!
>
> Quick question, is the driver still consider experimental??
Very much so. The S
First a very big thanks to all of u! I have been suffering a serious
lack of sleep problem lately.. i should have noticed that by whom has
been submitting the past 500 fixes and updates!
Quick question, is the driver still consider experimental?? the guys i
work with say it doesn't support sa
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 16:12 +, Srdjan Todorovic wrote:
> > I'm working on a set of patches for the initio scsi driver and I found
> > some strangeness with its header file, initio.h. I noticed that
> > sun3_scsi.c and sun3_scsi_vme.c include the he
If you want help, please don't drop linux-scsi.
On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 12:03 +0530, MASTHAN DUDEKULA wrote:
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> I have one question to you.
> Can you please answetr this one ?
> What is SG_IO equivalent of SCSI_IOCTL_SCSI_COMMAND on sd devices ?
>
> In otherwords How ca
On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 16:12 +, Srdjan Todorovic wrote:
> I'm working on a set of patches for the initio scsi driver and I found
> some strangeness with its header file, initio.h. I noticed that
> sun3_scsi.c and sun3_scsi_vme.c include the header, and it uses defines
> such as SCSI_ABORT_SNOOZE
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 04:36:59PM +, Srdjan Todorovic wrote:
> I'll recheck the other drivers then. It would seem the only users then
> are initio and sun3*. What's the best thing to do about it?
> Should I keep things as they are with SCSI_ABORT_* or should I
> move them to include/scsi/ or s
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 04:12:06PM +, Srdjan Todorovic wrote:
> > So how is it possible that other drivers such as aha1542.c use these
> > defines?
>
> Possibly, they don't. I just looked at the ncr53c8xx driver, and the
> only uses of SCSI_ABORT
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 04:12:06PM +, Srdjan Todorovic wrote:
> So how is it possible that other drivers such as aha1542.c use these defines?
Possibly, they don't. I just looked at the ncr53c8xx driver, and the
only uses of SCSI_ABORT_* are inside an #if 0 block. The same is true
for aha1542
Hi,
I'm working on a set of patches for the initio scsi driver and I found
some strangeness with its header file, initio.h. I noticed that
sun3_scsi.c and sun3_scsi_vme.c include the header, and it uses defines
such as SCSI_ABORT_SNOOZE (defined in initio.h).
I did some grepping and am now confus
From: Heiko Carstens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
zfcp_fsf_protstatus_eval() takes always the 'wrong' branch.
Likely Profiling Results
-
[+- ] Type | # True | # False | Function:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+unlikely | 11042|0 zfcp_fsf_protstatus_e
18 matches
Mail list logo
