Jens Axboe wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> resp_inquiry() does a GFP_KERNEL memory allocation, but it's not allowed
> to from the queuecommand context. There's no good way to return this
> error, so I used DID_ERROR which is used from similar paths. That
> doesn't seem quite right though, it would be better
Hi Sumant,
While trying to debug Dell PERC 5/i RAID controller problems we've been
having with the megaraid_sas driver, we've been inspecting differences
between the Red Hat EL 4 kernel (which Dell officially supports) versus
the stock Linux 2.6.17.13 driver we use. We found a very interesting
ch
James Bottomley wrote:
As I read the code Mark sent me, current libata will only accept ATA_16
for ATAPI devices (whether type 5 or not) ... pehaps this needs to be
altered?
It could be.
Both ATA_12 and ATA_16 are just ways of getting a taskfile sent
down to the LLD, and ATA_12 is merely a re
NACK this patch.
Reason for NACK : Upstream code in the sdev state change
routine validates the state change and returns success
when old state and new state are same and this result in
unblocking the request queue correctly in
scsi_internal_device_unblock function, which is not what is
describe
On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 14:23 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c: In function 'lpfc_pci_probe_one':
> > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c:1418: warning: implicit declaration of
> > function 'pci_select_bars'
> > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c:1422: warning: implicit declaration
On Wed, 03 Jan 2007 16:06:48 -0600
James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 10:44 -0500, James Smart wrote:
> > ACK :)
> >
> > (I thought this had already gone in a while ago)
>
> Actually, there seems to be missing infrastructure for this:
>
> CC [M] drivers/scsi/
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 10:44 -0500, James Smart wrote:
> ACK :)
>
> (I thought this had already gone in a while ago)
Actually, there seems to be missing infrastructure for this:
CC [M] drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.o
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c: In function 'lpfc_pci_probe_one':
drivers/scsi/
On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 14:39 -0500, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> James Bottomley wrote:
> > Those send out taskfile commands ... my point is that the SAT SCSI
> > commands only come down the SCSI paths, so without additional processing
> > in the ATAPI path they're just packaged up as PACKET commands an
James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 00:42 -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
>> James Bottomley wrote:
>>> I don't think I quite understand what you're trying to do here. My
>>> understanding is that ATA_12 and ATA_16 are part of the SAT layer. i.e.
>>> they're used when we're speaking SCSI to an
ACK
-- james
Mariusz Kozlowski wrote:
Hello,
Add kmalloc failure check and fix the loop on error path. Without the
patch pool element at index [0] will not be freed.
Signed-off-by: Mariusz Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_mem.c |6 +-
1 file changed, 5 in
James Bottomley wrote:
Er I've only seen one patch ... I did ask if there was another to add
the ATA_16 interpretation ... did that get lost by the SCSI reflector?
Ahh.. my apologies on that, James.
The two patches apply and build independently,
and the second patch was only for libata, so it
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> This patch makes sg dio use the block layer functions
> (blk_rq_map_user, blk_execute_rq_nowait, etc). It's an updated version
> of the following patch:
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=116527334121826&w=2
>
> This doesn't break any existing features. Whil
On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 10:45 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 00:42 -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
> >> James Bottomley wrote:
> >>> I don't think I quite understand what you're trying to do here. My
> >>> understanding is that ATA_12 and ATA_16 are part of the
James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 00:42 -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
James Bottomley wrote:
I don't think I quite understand what you're trying to do here. My
understanding is that ATA_12 and ATA_16 are part of the SAT layer. i.e.
they're used when we're speaking SCSI to an underlying AT
On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 00:42 -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
> James Bottomley wrote:
> > I don't think I quite understand what you're trying to do here. My
> > understanding is that ATA_12 and ATA_16 are part of the SAT layer. i.e.
> > they're used when we're speaking SCSI to an underlying ATA device to
>
Hi Doug,
resp_inquiry() does a GFP_KERNEL memory allocation, but it's not allowed
to from the queuecommand context. There's no good way to return this
error, so I used DID_ERROR which is used from similar paths. That
doesn't seem quite right though, it would be better to return an error
indicating
This patch makes sg dio use the block layer functions
(blk_rq_map_user, blk_execute_rq_nowait, etc). It's an updated version
of the following patch:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=116527334121826&w=2
This doesn't break any existing features. While it converts sg dio to
use the block
17 matches
Mail list logo
