Douglas Gilbert wrote:
James Bottomley wrote:
On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 16:24 -0700, Luben Tuikov wrote:
Did someone have a patch or was there a talk
that SCSI Core is moving towards sending _only_ scatterlists
down to LLDDs? (effectively BUG_ON(!cmd->use_sg))
Yes, you can already see the be
James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 16:24 -0700, Luben Tuikov wrote:
>
>>Did someone have a patch or was there a talk
>>that SCSI Core is moving towards sending _only_ scatterlists
>>down to LLDDs? (effectively BUG_ON(!cmd->use_sg))
>
>
> Yes, you can already see the beginnings in th
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, James Bottomley wrote:
> OK, why don't we do this. Instead of having me trawl through the trees
> looking for the correct patch to reverse, why don't you attach it in an
> email and I'll try to get it in to 2.6.13?
Looks like just reverting that patch is not enough. More in
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 11:25:25PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 04:02:31PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > Last time I tried to do something like this, it fell over with
> > multi-function serial ports. Look at this example:
> >
> > # ls -l /sys/class/tty/ttyS*/device | c
Hi,
Did someone have a patch or was there a talk
that SCSI Core is moving towards sending _only_ scatterlists
down to LLDDs? (effectively BUG_ON(!cmd->use_sg))
Luben
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
--- James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 16:24 -0700, Luben Tuikov wrote:
> > Did someone have a patch or was there a talk
> > that SCSI Core is moving towards sending _only_ scatterlists
> > down to LLDDs? (effectively BUG_ON(!cmd->use_sg))
>
> Yes, you can already
On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 16:24 -0700, Luben Tuikov wrote:
> Did someone have a patch or was there a talk
> that SCSI Core is moving towards sending _only_ scatterlists
> down to LLDDs? (effectively BUG_ON(!cmd->use_sg))
Yes, you can already see the beginnings in the -mm tree.
Jens is maintaining a
Hi,
Did someone have a patch or was there a talk
that SCSI Core is moving towards sending _only_ scatterlists
down to LLDDs? (effectively BUG_ON(!cmd->use_sg))
Luben
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mor
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 04:02:31PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 02:39:56PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > Heh, I already have a patch like this pending for 2.6.14 at:
> >
> > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh-2.6/gregkh-01-driver/driver-link-devic
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 21:33 +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > Just to make sure everyone agrees on this - there's currently a know bug
> > in dc395x with highmem reported by Pierre Ossman in thread "Kernel panic
> > with dc395x in 2.6.12.2" on
I recently tried to construct a totally generic transport class and
found there were certain features missing from the current abstract
transport class. Most notable is that you have to hang the data on the
class_device but most of the API is framed in terms of the generic
device, not the class_de
On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 21:33 +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Just to make sure everyone agrees on this - there's currently a know bug
> in dc395x with highmem reported by Pierre Ossman in thread "Kernel panic
> with dc395x in 2.6.12.2" on linux-scsi. It is also trivial to reproduce on
> non
This patch is necessary if we begin exposing underlying physical disks
(which can attach to the SPI transport class) of the hardware RAID
cards, since we don't want any SPI parameters binding to the raid
devices.
James
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_spi.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_spi.
Hi
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, James Bottomley wrote:
> This is my (hopefully final) collection of safe driver updates and bug
> fixes for 2.6.13.
Just to make sure everyone agrees on this - there's currently a know bug
in dc395x with highmem reported by Pierre Ossman in thread "Kernel panic
with dc39
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 02:39:56PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> Heh, I already have a patch like this pending for 2.6.14 at:
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh-2.6/gregkh-01-driver/driver-link-device-and-class.patch
Last time I tried to do something like this, it fel
On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 08:42 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'll trust that James B's fix resolves things. Thought my testing was
> straight-forward and ok. Guess not. Humbled again as a mere mortal in
> the world of sysfs and transport/container logic... :)
Well ... I confidently predict that y
I'll trust that James B's fix resolves things. Thought my testing was
straight-forward and ok. Guess not. Humbled again as a mere mortal in
the world of sysfs and transport/container logic... :)
Anyway, the last item that needs discussion is what name should the
symlink have ?
Here's a few points
17 matches
Mail list logo
