[no subject]

2005-01-30 Thread slash
unsubscribe linux-scsi This message was sent using Zonemail. http://www.thezoneinternet.com.au - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info

Re: SCSI aic7xxx driver: Initialization Failure over a kdump reboot

2005-01-30 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 07:27:26PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 13:27 -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 04:38:32AM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 11:53:27PM -0500, Lukasz Kosewski wrote: > > > > I have an idea of somethin

Re: SCSI aic7xxx driver: Initialization Failure over a kdump reboot

2005-01-30 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 13:27 -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 04:38:32AM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 11:53:27PM -0500, Lukasz Kosewski wrote: > > > I have an idea of something I might do for 2.6.11, but I doubt anyone > > > will actually agree with

Re: SCSI aic7xxx driver: Initialization Failure over a kdump reboot

2005-01-30 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 04:38:32AM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 11:53:27PM -0500, Lukasz Kosewski wrote: > > I have an idea of something I might do for 2.6.11, but I doubt anyone > > will actually agree with it. Say we keep a counter of how many times > > interrupt x has

Re: shouldn't "irq" be module_param_array instead of module_param in scsi/gdth.c ?

2005-01-30 Thread Randy.Dunlap
Jesper Juhl wrote: On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Randy.Dunlap wrote: Jesper Juhl wrote: This little warning made me take a closer look : drivers/scsi/gdth.c:645: warning: return from incompatible pointer type And line 645 looks like this : module_param(irq, int, 0); looking a bit up in the file I find : /*

Re: shouldn't "irq" be module_param_array instead of module_param in scsi/gdth.c ?

2005-01-30 Thread Jesper Juhl
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > Jesper Juhl wrote: > > This little warning made me take a closer look : drivers/scsi/gdth.c:645: > > warning: return from incompatible pointer type > > > > And line 645 looks like this : > > > > module_param(irq, int, 0); > > > > looking a bit up in th

Re: shouldn't "irq" be module_param_array instead of module_param in scsi/gdth.c ?

2005-01-30 Thread Randy.Dunlap
Jesper Juhl wrote: This little warning made me take a closer look : drivers/scsi/gdth.c:645: warning: return from incompatible pointer type And line 645 looks like this : module_param(irq, int, 0); looking a bit up in the file I find : /* IRQ list for GDT3000/3020 EISA controllers */ static int i

shouldn't "irq" be module_param_array instead of module_param in scsi/gdth.c ?

2005-01-30 Thread Jesper Juhl
This little warning made me take a closer look : drivers/scsi/gdth.c:645: warning: return from incompatible pointer type And line 645 looks like this : module_param(irq, int, 0); looking a bit up in the file I find : /* IRQ list for GDT3000/3020 EISA controllers */ static int irq[MAXHA] __ini