Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.

2007-06-01 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 16:16:01 +0900, Tejun Heo said: > Don't those thingies usually have NV cache or backed by battery such > that ORDERED_DRAIN is enough? Probably *most* do, but do you really want to bet the user's data on it? > The problem is that the interface between the host and a storage de

Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.

2007-07-10 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 14:39:41 EDT, Ric Wheeler said: > All of the high end arrays have non-volatile cache (read, on power loss, it > is a > promise that it will get all of your data out to permanent storage). You > don't > need to ask this kind of array to drain the cache. In fact, it might jus

Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.

2007-07-12 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:44:21 EDT, Ric Wheeler said: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 14:39:41 EDT, Ric Wheeler said: > > > >> All of the high end arrays have non-volatile cache (read, on power loss, > >> it is a > >> promise that it will get all of your data out to permanent st