On Tuesday November 15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > mdadm --add /dev/md0 /dev/sda2..
> yes , i am using raidstart for this. it should be the same.
No, it shouldn't.
raidstart is broken by design and cannot work reliable. It is one of
the main reasons that I wrote mdadm.
raidstart trusts the de
> mdadm --add /dev/md0 /dev/sda2..
yes , i am using raidstart for this. it should be the same.
I am handling a big cluster with supermicro machines,each machine has its
own 4 sata disks.I am using 2.6.6 kernel.
Did you ever pulled out a disk from raid5 while the machine was running ?
Just want to
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 09:27:25PM +0200, Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro) wrote:
> I have made the following test with my raid5:
> 1. created raid5 with 4 sata disks.
> 2. waited untill raid was fully initialized.
> 3. pulled a disk from the panel.
> 4. shut the system.
> 5. put back the disk.
> 6. turn on th
I have made the following test with my raid5:
1. created raid5 with 4 sata disks.
2. waited untill raid was fully initialized.
3. pulled a disk from the panel.
4. shut the system.
5. put back the disk.
6. turn on the system.
The raid failed failed to recver. i got message from the md layer
saying
