On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:26:00 -0800 (PST)
Luben Tuikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The reason was that my dev tree was tainted by this bug:
>
> if (good_bytes &&
> - scsi_end_request(cmd, 1, good_bytes, !!result) == NULL)
> + scsi_end_request(cmd, 1, good_bytes, result
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 03:05:39AM -0800
> > On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 12:00:12 +0100
> > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Okay, I have identified the patch that causes the problem to appear,
> > > which
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 03:05:39AM -0800
> On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 12:00:12 +0100
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Okay, I have identified the patch that causes the problem to appear, which
> > is
> >
> > fix-sense-key-medium-error-pro
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Okay, I have identified the patch that causes the problem to appear, which is
>
> fix-sense-key-medium-error-processing-and-retry.patch
>
> With this patch reverted -rc1-mm1 is happily running on my test box.
Yes! Here too. Good work.
regards,
--
http://www.fi.muni.c
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 12:00:12 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, I have identified the patch that causes the problem to appear, which is
>
> fix-sense-key-medium-error-processing-and-retry.patch
>
> With this patch reverted -rc1-mm1 is happily running on my test box.
Th
On Saturday, 16 December 2006 12:16, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, 16 December 2006 10:56, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Saturday, 16 December 2006 00:38, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Friday, 15 December 2006 23:24, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > On F
On Saturday, 16 December 2006 10:56, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, 16 December 2006 00:38, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, 15 December 2006 23:24, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Friday, 15 December 2006 22:39, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > >> On Fri, 15
On Saturday, 16 December 2006 00:38, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, 15 December 2006 23:24, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Friday, 15 December 2006 22:39, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >> On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:05:52 -0800
> > >> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 04:48:44PM -0500
> The "Re: Linux 2.6.20-rc1" sub-thread that had Jens and Alistair John
> Strachan replying seemed to implicate some core block layer badness.
>
The original problem (not mounting my raid6 partition) is observable i
On Friday, 15 December 2006 23:24, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, 15 December 2006 22:39, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:05:52 -0800
> >> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Jeff, I shall send all the sata patches which I have at you o
On Friday, 15 December 2006 23:19, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Alan wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:39:27 -0800
> > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:05:52 -0800
> >> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Jeff, I shall send all the sata patches which
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, 15 December 2006 22:39, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:05:52 -0800
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jeff, I shall send all the sata patches which I have at you one single time
and I shall then drop the lot. So please don't flub them.
I
On Friday, 15 December 2006 22:39, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:05:52 -0800
> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Jeff, I shall send all the sata patches which I have at you one single time
> > and I shall then drop the lot. So please don't flub them.
> >
> > I'll the
Alan wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:39:27 -0800
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:05:52 -0800
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jeff, I shall send all the sata patches which I have at you one single time
and I shall then drop the lot. So please don't flub
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:39:27 -0800
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:05:52 -0800
> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Jeff, I shall send all the sata patches which I have at you one single time
> > and I shall then drop the lot. So please don't flub th
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
The other box is mine and it works just fine with 2.6.20-rc1.
I think something bad happened in sata land just recently.
Yup. Please see, for example:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=116621656432500&w=2
It looks like the breakage is in sata, in the p
The "Re: Linux 2.6.20-rc1" sub-thread that had Jens and Alistair John
Strachan replying seemed to implicate some core block layer badness.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
On Friday, 15 December 2006 23:06, Alan wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:39:27 -0800
> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:05:52 -0800
> > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Jeff, I shall send all the sata patches which I have at you one single
>
On Friday, 15 December 2006 22:49, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > The other box is mine and it works just fine with 2.6.20-rc1.
> >
> >> I think something bad happened in sata land just recently.
> >
> > Yup. Please see, for example:
> >
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=li
On Friday, 15 December 2006 22:39, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:05:52 -0800
> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Jeff, I shall send all the sata patches which I have at you one single time
> > and I shall then drop the lot. So please don't flub them.
> >
> > I'll the
I don't think it's in -rc1, please see below.
On Friday, 15 December 2006 21:50, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Friday December 15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > From: Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 06:20:57PM +1100
> > > i.e. current -mm is good for 2.6.20 (though I have a f
On Friday, 15 December 2006 22:05, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 07:50:01 +1100
> Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Friday December 15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > From: Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Date: Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 06:20:57PM +1100
> > > > i.e. curre
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:05:52 -0800
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeff, I shall send all the sata patches which I have at you one single time
> and I shall then drop the lot. So please don't flub them.
>
> I'll then do a rc1-mm2 without them.
hm, this is looking like a lot of work f
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 07:50:01 +1100
Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday December 15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > From: Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 06:20:57PM +1100
> > > i.e. current -mm is good for 2.6.20 (though I have a few other little
> > > thin
On Friday December 15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 06:20:57PM +1100
> > i.e. current -mm is good for 2.6.20 (though I have a few other little
> > things I'll be sending in soon, they aren't related to the raid6
> > problem).
> >
> 2.
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 20:21:46 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 06:20:57PM +1100
> > i.e. current -mm is good for 2.6.20 (though I have a few other little
> > things I'll be sending in soon, they aren't related to the raid6
> > proble
26 matches
Mail list logo
