Peter Rabbitson wrote:
I have been trying to figure out the best chunk size for raid10 before
migrating my server to it (currently raid1). I am looking at 3 offset
stripes, as I want to have two drive failure redundancy, and offset
striping is said to have the best write performance, with read
Richard Scobie wrote:
Peter Rabbitson wrote:
Is this anywhere near the top of the todo list, or for now raid10
users are bound to a maximum read speed of a two drive combination?
I have not done any testing with the md native RAID10 implementations,
so perhaps there are some other advantages
Peter Rabbitson wrote:
Is this anywhere near the top of the todo list, or for now raid10 users
are bound to a maximum read speed of a two drive combination?
I have not done any testing with the md native RAID10 implementations,
so perhaps there are some other advantages, but have you tried se
Neil Brown wrote:
The different block sizes in the reads will make very little
difference to the results as the kernel will be doing read-ahead for
you. If you want to really test throughput at different block sizes
you need to insert random seeks.
Neil, thank you for the time and effort to a
On Tuesday March 6, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> I have been trying to figure out the best chunk size for raid10 before
> migrating my server to it (currently raid1). I am looking at 3 offset
> stripes, as I want to have two drive failure redundancy, and offset
> striping is said to have the
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Peter Rabbitson wrote:
Hi,
I have been trying to figure out the best chunk size for raid10 before
By any chance did you remember to increase stripe_cache_size to match
the chunk size? If not, there you go.
At the end of /usr/src/linux/Documentation/md.txt it specifical
Peter Rabbitson wrote:
Hi,
I have been trying to figure out the best chunk size for raid10 before
migrating my server to it (currently raid1). I am looking at 3 offset
stripes, as I want to have two drive failure redundancy, and offset
striping is said to have the best write performance, with