Re: New features?

2006-10-31 Thread John Rowe
Thanks for this Neil, good to know that most of what I would like is already available. I think your reply highlights what I almost put in there as my first priority: documentation, specifically a HOWTO. > I believe that 2.6.18 has SATA hot-swap, so this should be available > know ... providing yo

New features?

2006-10-31 Thread John Rowe
All this discussion has led me to wonder if we users of linux RAID have a clear consensus of what our priorities are, ie what are the things we really want to see soon as opposed to the many things that would be nice but not worth delaying the important things for. FWIW, here are mine, in order alt

Re: Two-disk RAID5?

2006-05-05 Thread John Rowe
> Sorry, I couldn't find a diplomatic way to say you're completely wrong. We don't necessarily expect a diplomatic way, but a clear and intelligent one would be helpful. In two-disk RAID5 which is it? 1) The 'parity bit' is the same as the datum. 2) The parity bit is the complement of the

Re: RAID-related: SATA disk removal?

2006-04-29 Thread John Rowe
Your error output looks just like what I got on my screen when I just removed the disk. Did you try removing it from the arrays first? Basically warm-swap. Google suggests one or two people have tried it. John - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of

RAID-related: SATA disk removal?

2006-04-28 Thread John Rowe
I am testing a machine with two SATA drives in startech.com removable caddies. Everything including swap is RAID1. (I'm running x86_64 Scientific Linux 4.2, a RedHat enterprise clone.) Informal tests suggest that pulling out an active disk causes the whole machine to hang up but removing a disk fr

Two-disk RAID5?

2006-04-26 Thread John Rowe
I'm about to create a RAID1 file system and a strange thought occurs to me: if I create a two-disk RAID5 array then I can grow it later by the simple expedient of adding a third disk and hence doubling its size. Is there any real down-side to this, such as performance? Alternatively is it likely t

Re: Re[2]: Concept problem with RAID1?

2006-03-24 Thread John Rowe
A much nicer way to get that sort of reliability would be for RAID6 to periodically scan the blocks on the device and to use the extra information to do ECC (and for RAID5 to at tell syslog). John - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to