On Nov 24, 2007 12:20 PM, Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Does that match what's in the init files used at boot? By any chance
> does the information there explicitly list partitions by name? If you
> change to "PARTITIONS" in /etc/mdadm.conf it won't bite you until you
> change the de
Joshua Johnson wrote:
Greetings, long time listener, first time caller.
I recently replaced a disk in my existing 8 disk RAID 6 array.
Previously, all disks were PATA drives connected to the motherboard
IDE and 3 promise Ultra 100/133 controllers. I replaced one of the
Promise controllers with
>>> On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 22:09:27 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> said:
> [ ... ] a RAID 10 "personality" defined in md that can be
> implemented using mdadm. If so, is it available in 2.6.20.11,
> [ ... ]
Very good choice about 'raid10' in general. For a single layer
just use '-l raid10'. Run 'man m
Hi,
I'm running 2.6.23.8 x86_64 using mdadm v2.6.4.
I was adding a disk (/dev/sdf) to an existing raid5 (/dev/sd[a-e] -> md0)
During that reshape (at around 4%) /dev/sdd reported read errors and
went offline.
I replaced /dev/sdd with a new drive and tried to reassemble the array
(/dev/sdd was
Hello linux-raid,
I have a home fileserver which used a 6-disk RAID5 array
with old disks and cheap IDE controllers (all disks are
IDE masters).
As was expected, sooner or later the old hardware (and/or
cabling) began failing. The array falls apart, in particular
currently it has 5 working
