Kernels and MD versions (was: md: Introduction - raid5 reshape mark-2)

Neil Brown wrote: > I always make them against the latest -mm kernel, so that would be a > good place to start. However things change quickly and I can't > promise it will apply against whatever is the 'latest' today. > > If you would like to nominate a particular recent kernel, I'll create > a p

Re: [PATCH 000 of 7] md: Introduction - raid5 reshape mark-2

On Tuesday February 7, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello linux world! > > Excuse me for being so ignorant but /exactly how/ do I go about to find > out which files to download from kernel.org that will approve these > patches? I always make them against the latest -mm kernel, so that would be a go

Re: Question: array locking, possible?

On Wed, 8 Feb 2006 11:55:49 +0100 Chris Osicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I was thinking about it, I have no idea how to do it on Linux if ever > possible. > I connect over fibre channel SAN, using QLogic QLA2312 HBAS, if it matters. > > Anyone any hints? I too am running a jbod with md

RAID 106 array

I was doing some advanced planning for storage, and it came to me that there might be benefit from thinking outside the box on RAID config. Therefore I offer this for comment. The object is reliability with performance. The means is to set up two arrays on physical devices, one RAID-0 for perfo

Re: mdraid0 worries on 2.6

Also sprach Richard Mittendorfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Tue, 7 Feb 2006 01:12:20 +0100): > Hi, > > I do have _great_ performance troubles with software raid0 with 2.6.12 > to .15. I have not tried earlier 2.6's, but 2.4 (tested up to 2.4.24) > do it right. > > In fact, mdraid0 over 2 rather old 9G

RAID 5 inaccessible

Hi, I found out that my storage drive was gone and I went to my server to check out what wrong. I've got 3 400GB disks wich form the array. I found out I had one spare and one faulty drive, and the RAID 5 array was not able to recover. After a reboot because of some stuff with Xen my main rootdis

uPositive

Hey whats up, We makes it easy to oor der the mea dica itions you need. Our 0nline Farm eaacy offers a safe way to 0arder ch eeap Nia agra and Liv= eeitra onlinea The easiest way to beuy these from our site. Men/Women's health, alleergy, paain, weeight loss and many others -

Re: mdadm and monitoring

On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, discman (sent by Nabble.com) wrote: > Hi. > > Anyone with some experience on mdadm? Just about everyone here, I'd hope ;-) > I have a running RAID0-array with mdadm and it`s using monitor-mode with an > e-mail address. > Anyone knows how to remove that e-mail adress without d

Re: Question: array locking, possible?

I was thinking about it, I have no idea how to do it on Linux if ever possible. I connect over fibre channel SAN, using QLogic QLA2312 HBAS, if it matters. Anyone any hints? Thanks and regards, Chris On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 14:26:13 -0500 Paul Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chris Osicki wr

Re: Question: array locking, possible?

On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 10:16:20 -0800 Mike Hardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Chris Osicki wrote: > > > > > To rephrase my question, is there any way to make it visible to the > > other host that the array is up an running on the this host? > > > > Any comments, ideas? > > Would that not im