Em 12-12-2011 19:24, Andreas Oberritter escreveu:
> On 12.12.2011 14:56, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> On 12-12-2011 11:40, Manu Abraham wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
>>
This also means that just doing an alias from FE_QAM and
SYS_DVBC_ANNEX_AC
t
On 12.12.2011 14:56, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> On 12-12-2011 11:40, Manu Abraham wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
>
>>> This also means that just doing an alias from FE_QAM and
>>> SYS_DVBC_ANNEX_AC
>>> to
>>> SYS_DVBC_ANNEX_A may break something, as, for most
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 1:09 AM, Thomas Kernen wrote:
> On 12/12/11 2:40 PM, Manu Abraham wrote:
>
or is it multiplied by a factor
of 10 or was it 100 ? (Oh, my god my application Y uses a factor
of 10, the X application uses 100 and the Z application uses 1000).
What a lovely
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
> On 12-12-2011 13:00, Manu Abraham wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12-12-2011 11:40, Manu Abraham wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
>
On 12-12-2011 13:00, Manu Abraham wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
On 12-12-2011 11:40, Manu Abraham wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
This also means that just doing an alias from FE_QAM and
SYS_DVBC_ANNEX_AC
to
SYS_DVBC_AN
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
> On 12-12-2011 11:40, Manu Abraham wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
>
>
>>> This also means that just doing an alias from FE_QAM and
>>> SYS_DVBC_ANNEX_AC
>>> to
>>> SYS_DVBC_ANNEX_A may break somethi
On 12-12-2011 11:40, Manu Abraham wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
This also means that just doing an alias from FE_QAM and SYS_DVBC_ANNEX_AC
to
SYS_DVBC_ANNEX_A may break something, as, for most devices,
SYS_DVBC_ANNEX_AC
really means both Annex A and C.
With
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
> On 12-12-2011 01:59, Manu Abraham wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10-12-2011 02:43, Manu Abraham wrote:
>>>
>>>
From 92a79a1e0a1b5403f06f60661f00ede365b10108 Mon Sep 17
On 12-12-2011 01:59, Manu Abraham wrote:
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
On 10-12-2011 02:43, Manu Abraham wrote:
From 92a79a1e0a1b5403f06f60661f00ede365b10108 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Manu Abraham
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 17:09:09 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 06
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
> On 10-12-2011 02:43, Manu Abraham wrote:
>
>
>> From 92a79a1e0a1b5403f06f60661f00ede365b10108 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Manu Abraham
>> Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 17:09:09 +0530
>> Subject: [PATCH 06/10] DVB: Use a unique deliver
On 10-12-2011 02:43, Manu Abraham wrote:
From 92a79a1e0a1b5403f06f60661f00ede365b10108 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Manu Abraham
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 17:09:09 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 06/10] DVB: Use a unique delivery system identifier for
DVBC_ANNEX_C,
just like any other. DVBC_ANNEX_A and
From 92a79a1e0a1b5403f06f60661f00ede365b10108 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Manu Abraham
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 17:09:09 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 06/10] DVB: Use a unique delivery system identifier for DVBC_ANNEX_C,
just like any other. DVBC_ANNEX_A and DVBC_ANNEX_C have slightly
different parame
12 matches
Mail list logo