On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Enrico wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Enrico wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
>>> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Enrico wrote:
>>
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Enrico wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Enrico wrote:
Ok, i made it work. It was missing just the config_out
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Enrico wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Enrico wrote:
>>> Ok, i made it work. It was missing just the config_outlineoffset i
>>> wrote before and a missing FLDMODE in SYNC registers.
>
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Enrico wrote:
>> Ok, i made it work. It was missing just the config_outlineoffset i
>> wrote before and a missing FLDMODE in SYNC registers.
>>
>
> Great, do you get the ghosting effect or do you h
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Enrico wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Enrico wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Enrico wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
Perfect, thank you Enrico. I will try this latter today and let you
know. I'm
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Enrico wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Enrico wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
>>> Perfect, thank you Enrico. I will try this latter today and let you
>>> know. I'm sure I can get this working (with the ghosting effect
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Enrico wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Enrico wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Enrico wrote:
I have updated my igep openembedded layer at [1] (testing branch) with
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Enrico wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Enrico wrote:
>>> I have updated my igep openembedded layer at [1] (testing branch) with:
>>
>> Ops, forgot [1] !
>>
>> [1]: https://github.com
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Enrico wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Enrico wrote:
>>> I have updated my igep openembedded layer at [1] (testing branch) with:
>>
>> Ops, forgot [1] !
>>
>> [1]: https://github.com
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Enrico wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Enrico wrote:
>> I have updated my igep openembedded layer at [1] (testing branch) with:
>
> Ops, forgot [1] !
>
> [1]: https://github.com/ebutera/meta-igep
>
> Enrico
>
Perfect, thank you Enrico. I will try this
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Enrico wrote:
> I have updated my igep openembedded layer at [1] (testing branch) with:
Ops, forgot [1] !
[1]: https://github.com/ebutera/meta-igep
Enrico
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majo
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
wrote:
> Is your tree (igep 3.1.0rc9 kernel + omap3isp-yuv patches) accessible
> so I can clone and give a try?
>
> I can then make a patch-set on top on that, one that I can actually
> test on real hardware and be sure that is working wel
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Enrico wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1:00 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Enrico wrote:
>>> I made some tests and unfortunately there are some problems.
>>>
>>> Note: i made these tests picking some patches from omap
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1:00 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Enrico wrote:
>> I made some tests and unfortunately there are some problems.
>>
>> Note: i made these tests picking some patches from omap3isp-yuv branch
>> and applying to igep 3.1.0rc9 kernel (
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Enrico wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
> wrote:
>> Yes, I'll cook a patch today on top on your omap3isp-yuv and send for
>> review. I won't be able to test neither since I don't have proper
>> hardware at home. But at least you w
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
wrote:
> Yes, I'll cook a patch today on top on your omap3isp-yuv and send for
> review. I won't be able to test neither since I don't have proper
> hardware at home. But at least you will get an idea of the approach we
> are using to solve
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Friday 07 October 2011 11:31:46 Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Enrico wrote:
>> > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Enrico w
Hi,
On Friday 07 October 2011 11:31:46 Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Enrico wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Enrico wrote:
> >>> - i don't see Deepthy patches, it seems to be based o
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2011-10-07 05:02, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Enrico wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
Do we know for sure that these problems are happening in the ISP it
On 2011-10-07 05:02, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Enrico wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
Do we know for sure that these problems are happening in the ISP itself
or could they possibly be in the TVP5150? Does anyone have experienc
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Enrico wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
>> Do we know for sure that these problems are happening in the ISP itself
>> or could they possibly be in the TVP5150? Does anyone have experience
>> with a different analogue encoder?
>
> Never
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> Do we know for sure that these problems are happening in the ISP itself
> or could they possibly be in the TVP5150? Does anyone have experience
> with a different analogue encoder?
Never tried another encoder, but at this point it's something
On 2011-10-07 04:08, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2011-10-06 10:11, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Gary Thomaswrote:
On 2011-10-06 08:50, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 4
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2011-10-06 10:11, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2011-10-06 08:50, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
On 2011-10-06 10:11, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2011-10-06 08:50, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Gary Thomaswrote:
On 2011-10
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Enrico wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Enrico wrote:
>>> - i don't see Deepthy patches, it seems to be based on the
>>> pre-Deepthy-patches driver and fixed (not that this is a bad thin
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Enrico wrote:
>> - i don't see Deepthy patches, it seems to be based on the
>> pre-Deepthy-patches driver and fixed (not that this is a bad thing!);
>> i say this because, like Gary, i'm interested i
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2011-10-06 08:50, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2011-10-06 01:51, Javier Martinez Canillas w
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Enrico wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
> wrote:
>> Since the patches are not against mainline I can't post for reviewing
>> but can be found in one of our development trees [1]. Comments are
>> highly appreciated.
>>
>> The tree is
On 2011-10-06 08:50, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2011-10-06 01:51, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
wrote:
> Since the patches are not against mainline I can't post for reviewing
> but can be found in one of our development trees [1]. Comments are
> highly appreciated.
>
> The tree is a 2.6.37 that already contain Deepthy patch. I rebased
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
>> On 2011-10-06 01:51, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
>>> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Enri
On 2011-10-06 01:51, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Enrico wrote:
Hi all,
since we are all interested in this driver (and tvp5150) i'll try to
make a summary of the current situation and underst
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Enrico wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> since we are all interested in this driver (and tvp5150) i'll try to
>> make a summary of the current situation and understand what is needed
>> to finally get it into
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Enrico wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> since we are all interested in this driver (and tvp5150) i'll try to
> make a summary of the current situation and understand what is needed
> to finally get it into the main tree instead of having to apply a
> dozen patches manually.
>
>
Hi all,
since we are all interested in this driver (and tvp5150) i'll try to
make a summary of the current situation and understand what is needed
to finally get it into the main tree instead of having to apply a
dozen patches manually.
The current status of git repositories/branches is:
- main
36 matches
Mail list logo
