On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Tue, 21 Jul 2009 09:14:36 +0200
> Matthias Schwarzott escreveu:
> It is not a good idea to run as root. Most people compile everything
> with a normal user and then use "sudo" command to install/remove/insert
> modules. Unfortunately, dependin
Em Tue, 21 Jul 2009 09:14:36 +0200
Matthias Schwarzott escreveu:
> Hi Mauro!
>
> is there any reason to not pull this besides time?
Time is one reason, however, there's another:
It is not a good idea to run as root. Most people compile everything
with a normal user and then use "sudo" comman
On Dienstag, 23. Juni 2009, Trent Piepho wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 16:36 +0200, Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
> > > > It seems the path to lsmod tool is hardcoded in the Makefile for
> > > > out-of-tree building of v4l-dvb.
> >
> > Shouldn't $
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 16:36 +0200, Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
> > > It seems the path to lsmod tool is hardcoded in the Makefile for
> > > out-of-tree building of v4l-dvb.
> >
> Shouldn't $PATH of root be considered safe? Else the distro or the sy
On Dienstag, 23. Juni 2009, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 16:36 +0200, Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
> >> Hi list!
> >>
> >> It seems the path to lsmod tool is hardcoded in the Makefile for
> >> out-of-tree building of v4l-dvb.
> >> Now at l
On Dienstag, 23. Juni 2009, Trent Piepho wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 16:36 +0200, Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
> > > Hi list!
> > >
> > > It seems the path to lsmod tool is hardcoded in the Makefile for
> > > out-of-tree building of v4l-dvb.
> > > Now at
On Dienstag, 23. Juni 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 16:36 +0200, Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
> > Hi list!
> >
> > It seems the path to lsmod tool is hardcoded in the Makefile for
> > out-of-tree building of v4l-dvb.
> > Now at least gentoo has moved lsmod from /sbin to /bin.
> > Ad
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 16:36 +0200, Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
Hi list!
It seems the path to lsmod tool is hardcoded in the Makefile for out-of-tree
building of v4l-dvb.
Now at least gentoo has moved lsmod from /sbin to /bin.
Sorry, but is it considere
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 16:36 +0200, Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
> > Hi list!
> >
> > It seems the path to lsmod tool is hardcoded in the Makefile for out-of-tree
> > building of v4l-dvb.
> > Now at least gentoo has moved lsmod from /sbin to /bin.
Won't your p
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 16:36 +0200, Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
> Hi list!
>
> It seems the path to lsmod tool is hardcoded in the Makefile for out-of-tree
> building of v4l-dvb.
> Now at least gentoo has moved lsmod from /sbin to /bin.
> Additionally it is bad style (or at least I am told so), to
Hi list!
It seems the path to lsmod tool is hardcoded in the Makefile for out-of-tree
building of v4l-dvb.
Now at least gentoo has moved lsmod from /sbin to /bin.
Additionally it is bad style (or at least I am told so), to not rely on $PATH
but hardcode pathes for tools that should be in $PATH.
11 matches
Mail list logo
