Ooops! ;) I'm having some visual problems so you'll have to bear with me
for the next few months. OK, I copy and pasted your debug level of 63,
yes 63, into the echo command and outputted the result of svv -rg from
dmesg into the file, kernel.txt. I did NOT detach and reattach the
camera in thi
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:07:30 -0700
"T.P. Reitzel" <4066724...@vzwmail.net> wrote:
> OK, I've raised the level of debug to 15 as you requested.
I found no interesting information in your traces: the debug level is
too low and there is only the probe sequence. Please, may you do,
as root:
OK, I've raised the level of debug to 15 as you requested. Personally, I
hope the code for the internal capture card is still intact and bugs
simply prevent its use. Time will tell. ;) Evidently Intel isn't much
use as a source for documentation of equipment manufactured for them. I
wonder who
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:38:51 -0700
"T.P. Reitzel" <4066724...@vzwmail.net> wrote:
> Original linux driver for Intel PC Camera Pro (see link for more
> detail):
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/spca50x
The gspca v2 comes from this driver, so, it should work the same, but
some bug(s) may have b
Original linux driver for Intel PC Camera Pro (see link for more detail):
http://sourceforge.net/projects/spca50x
Intel's webpage for Intel Pro PC Camera (internal capture card):
http://downloadcenter.intel.com/filter_results.aspx?strTypes=all&ProductID=459&OSFullName=Windows*+98+SE&lang=eng&st
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:13:43 -0700
"T.P. Reitzel" <4066724...@vzwmail.net> wrote:
> I just pulled mercurial's v4l-dvb for Bluewhite64's 2.6.27.7 kernel.
> This spca505 driver for Intel's PC Camera Pro, 0733:0430 isn't even
> functioning. The MMAP feature of this driver just displays a screen of
>
