Re: arm tree in broken state (was Re: What's inside the pxa tree for this merge window)

2009-09-30 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
Hi Pavel On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > I discarded them _because_ Eric handled them, which is what I said in > > > > the > > > > comments when I discarded them. > > > > > > Ok, I did do my best to get patches in the right order in the mainline, > > > but it all failed. AFAIC

arm tree in broken state (was Re: What's inside the pxa tree for this merge window)

2009-09-30 Thread Pavel Machek
> > > I discarded them _because_ Eric handled them, which is what I said in the > > > comments when I discarded them. > > > > Ok, I did do my best to get patches in the right order in the mainline, > > but it all failed. AFAICS, v4l and sh are already in the mainline with a > > _wrongly_ resolv

Re: What's inside the pxa tree for this merge window

2009-09-21 Thread Jamie Lokier
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > Don't blame me for these delays - it's not my choice to impose such > delays. I'd really like to fix those broken platforms right now. I > just can't do so without causing additional delays for other issues. > Blame Linus for imposing the "max one pull a week" ru

Re: What's inside the pxa tree for this merge window

2009-09-21 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 09:19:46PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 08:43:47AM +0200, Matej Kenda wrote: > > > On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 19:46 +0800, Eric Miao wrote: > > > > Here's the preview of request-pull resu

Re: What's inside the pxa tree for this merge window

2009-09-21 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 08:43:47AM +0200, Matej Kenda wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 19:46 +0800, Eric Miao wrote: > > > Here's the preview of request-pull result, please let me know if there > > > is anything missed, thanks. > > > > > > UR