Re: VIDIOC_[GS]_JPEGCOMP clarifications

2009-06-02 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Nate, On Tuesday 02 June 2009 13:29:41 Dongsoo, Nathaniel Kim wrote: > On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > > the VIDIOC_[GS]_JPEGCOMP documentation in the V4L2 specification is far > > from being clear and complete (which is probably why it's marked as [to > > do]). I'

Re: VIDIOC_[GS]_JPEGCOMP clarifications

2009-06-02 Thread Dongsoo, Nathaniel Kim
Hi Laurent, On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi everybody, > > the VIDIOC_[GS]_JPEGCOMP documentation in the V4L2 specification is far from > being clear and complete (which is probably why it's marked as [to do]). I'm > implementing support for this ioctl in the uvcvide

VIDIOC_[GS]_JPEGCOMP clarifications

2009-06-02 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi everybody, the VIDIOC_[GS]_JPEGCOMP documentation in the V4L2 specification is far from being clear and complete (which is probably why it's marked as [to do]). I'm implementing support for this ioctl in the uvcvideo driver and I'd like to request your opinion about the expected ioctl behavi