In data mercoledì 1 agosto 2012 07:04:18, Jonathan Corbet ha scritto:
> On Wed, 1 Aug 2012 08:41:56 +0200
>
> Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > > The second patch adds a new memory allocator for the videobuf2. I
> > > name it videobuf2-dma-streaming but I think "streaming" is not
> > > the best choice, so
> In that case I need to see your latest version of the source code to
> see why it doesn't work.
I send it as patch v2 of the previous one
--
Federico Vaga
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majord
On Mon August 6 2012 09:38:10 Federico Vaga wrote:
>
> > > I applied all your suggestions, and some extra simplification;
> > > [...]
>
> > > ---
> > > - flags: optional. Set to V4L2_FL_USE_FH_PRIO if you want to let the
> > > framework handle the VIDIOC_G/S_PRIORITY ioctls. This requ
> > I applied all your suggestions, and some extra simplification;
> > [...]
> > ---
> > - flags: optional. Set to V4L2_FL_USE_FH_PRIO if you want to let the
> > framework handle the VIDIOC_G/S_PRIORITY ioctls. This requires that
> > you use struct v4l2_fh.
>
> ^^
>
On Sun August 5 2012 19:11:19 Federico Vaga wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> > Did you run the latest v4l2-compliance tool from the v4l-utils.git
> > repository over your driver? I'm sure you didn't since VIP is missing
> > support for control events and v4l2-compliance would certainly
> > complain about th
Hi Hans,
> Did you run the latest v4l2-compliance tool from the v4l-utils.git
> repository over your driver? I'm sure you didn't since VIP is missing
> support for control events and v4l2-compliance would certainly
> complain about that.
>
> Always check with v4l2-compliance whenever you make ch
On Wed, 1 Aug 2012 08:41:56 +0200
Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > The second patch adds a new memory allocator for the videobuf2. I name it
> > videobuf2-dma-streaming but I think "streaming" is not the best choice, so
> > suggestions are welcome. My inspiration for this buffer come from
> > videobuf-dma
On Tue July 31 2012 22:17:06 Federico Vaga wrote:
> As suggested I moved the Video Buffer Input (VIP) of the STA2X11 board to the
> videobuf2. This patch series is an RFC.
Thank you very much for working on this! Much appreciated!
> The first patch is just an update to the adv7180 because the VIP
I use git send-email command to send patches but I think I made a
mistake. If something
is wrong or confused please tell me and I try to resend all the
patches hopefully without mistake. Sorry again.
2012/7/31 Federico Vaga :
> As suggested I moved the Video Buffer Input (VIP) of the STA2X11 board
As suggested I moved the Video Buffer Input (VIP) of the STA2X11 board to the
videobuf2. This patch series is an RFC.
The first patch is just an update to the adv7180 because the VIP (the only
user) now use the control framework so query{g_|s_|ctrl} are not necessery.
The second patch adds a new
10 matches
Mail list logo
