RE: Version 2: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit

2010-06-07 Thread Hiremath, Vaibhav
> -Original Message- > From: Hans Verkuil [mailto:hverk...@xs4all.nl] > Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 3:20 PM > To: Guennadi Liakhovetski > Cc: Hiremath, Vaibhav; linux-media@vger.kernel.org > Subject: RE: Version 2: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit > >

RE: Version 2: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit

2010-06-07 Thread Hans Verkuil
> On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote: > >> > 14) V4L2 video output vs. framebuffer. Guennadi Liakhovetski. >> > >> [Hiremath, Vaibhav] Guennadi, >> >> Do you have anything in your mind on this? Are you preparing any slides >> for this? Do you want me to have something from OMAP side which

RE: Version 2: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit

2010-06-07 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote: > > 14) V4L2 video output vs. framebuffer. Guennadi Liakhovetski. > > > [Hiremath, Vaibhav] Guennadi, > > Do you have anything in your mind on this? Are you preparing any slides > for this? Do you want me to have something from OMAP side which we can

RE: Version 2: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit

2010-06-07 Thread Hiremath, Vaibhav
> -Original Message- > From: linux-media-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-media- > ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Hans Verkuil > Sent: Sunday, May 30, 2010 1:46 PM > To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Version 2: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-

Re: Version 2: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit

2010-06-06 Thread Andy Walls
On Sun, 2010-06-06 at 15:15 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote: > We are also completely full. The substantial interest in this summit shows > how active the v4l community is, in particular in the area of embedded > systems. It does look interesting. Sorry I'll have to miss it. Regards, Andy -- To uns

Re: Version 2: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit

2010-06-06 Thread Hans Verkuil
Hi all, The only change to the agenda has been that after the Qualcomm presentation there will also be a short presentation from ST-Ericsson on their hardware. We are also completely full. The substantial interest in this summit shows how active the v4l community is, in particular in the area of

Version 2: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit

2010-05-30 Thread Hans Verkuil
Hi all, This is the second version of a tentative agenda for the Helsinki mini-summit on June 14-16. Please reply to this thread if you have comments or want to add topics. If you want to attend the summit then contact Sakari Ailus (sakari.ai...@maxwell.research.nokia.com). We are very full alre

Re: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit

2010-05-30 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Sunday 30 May 2010 09:59:59 Hans Verkuil wrote: > On Wednesday 26 May 2010 17:46:16 Pawel Osciak wrote: > > Hi Hans, > > > > thank you for your work on this! > > > > >Hans Verkuil wrote: > > > > >3) videobuf/videobuf2: what are the shortcomings, what are the requirements > > >for a 'proper' v

Re: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit

2010-05-30 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Sunday 23 May 2010 20:02:59 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Sun, 23 May 2010, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > This is a tentative agenda for the Helsinki mini-summit on June 14-16. > > > > Please reply to this thread if you have comments or want to add topics. > > [snip] > > > 8

Re: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit

2010-05-30 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Wednesday 26 May 2010 17:46:16 Pawel Osciak wrote: > Hi Hans, > > thank you for your work on this! > > >Hans Verkuil wrote: > > >3) videobuf/videobuf2: what are the shortcomings, what are the requirements > >for a 'proper' videobuf implementation, can the existing videobuf be fixed or > >do w

RE: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit

2010-05-27 Thread Pawel Osciak
>Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: >On Thu, 27 May 2010, Pawel Osciak wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: >> > >> >No idea whether this is a worthy and suitable topic for this meeting, but: >> > >> >V4L(2) video output vs. framebuffer. >> > >> >How about a v4l2-output - fbdev translatio

RE: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit

2010-05-27 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Thu, 27 May 2010, Pawel Osciak wrote: > Hi, > > >Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > > >No idea whether this is a worthy and suitable topic for this meeting, but: > > > >V4L(2) video output vs. framebuffer. > > > >How about a v4l2-output - fbdev translation layer? You write a v4l2-output > >drive

RE: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit

2010-05-27 Thread Pawel Osciak
Hi, >Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > >No idea whether this is a worthy and suitable topic for this meeting, but: > >V4L(2) video output vs. framebuffer. > >How about a v4l2-output - fbdev translation layer? You write a v4l2-output >driver and get a framebuffer device free of charge... TBH, I haven'

RE: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit

2010-05-26 Thread Hiremath, Vaibhav
ns de Goede; Mauro > Carvalho Chehab > Subject: Re: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit > > On Sun, 23 May 2010, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > This is a tentative agenda for the Helsinki mini-summit on June 14-16. > > > > Please

Re: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit

2010-05-26 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Wednesday 26 May 2010 17:47:57 Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to add my "RFC: a processing plugin API for libv4l" to the > schedule, see the mail I just send. This actually is one of the main > reasons for me to come to the summit. OK, I'll add it. I'll post an update topic list t

Re: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit

2010-05-26 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Wednesday 26 May 2010 17:46:16 Pawel Osciak wrote: > Hi Hans, > > thank you for your work on this! > > >Hans Verkuil wrote: > > >3) videobuf/videobuf2: what are the shortcomings, what are the requirements > >for a 'proper' videobuf implementation, can the existing videobuf be fixed or > >do w

RE: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit

2010-05-26 Thread Pawel Osciak
Hi Hans, thank you for your work on this! >Hans Verkuil wrote: >3) videobuf/videobuf2: what are the shortcomings, what are the requirements >for a 'proper' videobuf implementation, can the existing videobuf be fixed or >do we need a videobuf2. If the latter, what would be needed to convert >exis

Re: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit

2010-05-26 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, I would like to add my "RFC: a processing plugin API for libv4l" to the schedule, see the mail I just send. This actually is one of the main reasons for me to come to the summit. Thanks & Regards, Hans On 05/23/2010 12:36 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote: Hi all, This is a tentative agenda for th

Re: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit

2010-05-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Hans, On Sunday 23 May 2010 12:36:48 Hans Verkuil wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a tentative agenda for the Helsinki mini-summit on June 14-16. > > Please reply to this thread if you have comments or want to add topics. > > The overall layout of the summit is to use the first day to go through

Re: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit

2010-05-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Mauro, On Sunday 23 May 2010 14:21:46 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Hans Verkuil wrote: [snip] > > Comments? Topics I missed? > > I'd like to add another topic: Remote Controllers. I propose to do a short > presentation on this theme, showing how the new RC subsystem was conceived > and dis

Re: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit

2010-05-23 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Sun, 23 May 2010, Hans Verkuil wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a tentative agenda for the Helsinki mini-summit on June 14-16. > > Please reply to this thread if you have comments or want to add topics. [snip] > 8) soc-camera status. Particularly with regards to the remaining soc-camera >de

Re: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit

2010-05-23 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Hans Verkuil wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a tentative agenda for the Helsinki mini-summit on June 14-16. > > Please reply to this thread if you have comments or want to add topics. > > The overall layout of the summit is to use the first day to go through all > topics and either come to a conclu

Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit

2010-05-23 Thread Hans Verkuil
Hi all, This is a tentative agenda for the Helsinki mini-summit on June 14-16. Please reply to this thread if you have comments or want to add topics. The overall layout of the summit is to use the first day to go through all topics and either come to a conclusion quickly for the 'simple' topics