On Friday, July 01, 2011 13:59:14 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em 01-07-2011 06:45, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> > On Thursday, June 30, 2011 22:35:15 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>
> >>> This also leads to another ambiguity with poll(): what should poll do if
> >>> another filehandle started strea
Em 01-07-2011 08:59, Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu:
> Em 01-07-2011 06:45, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
>> On Thursday, June 30, 2011 22:35:15 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>
This also leads to another ambiguity with poll(): what should poll do if
another filehandle started streaming? So fh1
Em 01-07-2011 06:45, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> On Thursday, June 30, 2011 22:35:15 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>>> This also leads to another ambiguity with poll(): what should poll do if
>>> another filehandle started streaming? So fh1 called STREAMON (and so
>>> becomes
>>> the 'owner' of the
On Thursday, June 30, 2011 22:35:15 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em 30-06-2011 10:46, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> > On Wednesday, June 29, 2011 16:35:04 Hans de Goede wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 06/29/2011 03:43 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, June 29, 2011 15:07:14 Hans de Goede wrote:
Em 30-06-2011 10:46, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> On Wednesday, June 29, 2011 16:35:04 Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 06/29/2011 03:43 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, June 29, 2011 15:07:14 Hans de Goede wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> if (q->num_buffers == 0&& q->fileio == NULL) {
>>> -
Em 29-06-2011 09:10, Hans de Goede escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> On 06/29/2011 01:26 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This RFC is based on recent discussions with regards to how the poll function
>> in a V4L2 driver should behave.
>>
>> Some relevant documents:
>>
>> POSIX:
>>
>> http://pubs.opengro
On Wednesday, June 29, 2011 16:35:04 Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 06/29/2011 03:43 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On Wednesday, June 29, 2011 15:07:14 Hans de Goede wrote:
>
>
>
> > if (q->num_buffers == 0&& q->fileio == NULL) {
> > - if (!V4L2_TYPE_IS_OUTPUT(q->type)&& (q->io
Hi,
On 06/29/2011 03:43 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Wednesday, June 29, 2011 15:07:14 Hans de Goede wrote:
Ok, yet more reason to go with my proposal, but then simplified to:
When streaming has not started return POLLIN or POLLOUT (or-ed with
POLLPRI if events are pending).
So would this
On Wednesday, June 29, 2011 15:07:14 Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 06/29/2011 02:42 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On Wednesday, June 29, 2011 14:10:44 Hans de Goede wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 06/29/2011 01:26 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>
>
>
> >>> 4) Proposal to change the poll behavior
> >>>
Hi,
On 06/29/2011 02:42 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Wednesday, June 29, 2011 14:10:44 Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 06/29/2011 01:26 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
4) Proposal to change the poll behavior
For the short term I propose that condition c is handled as follows:
If for the filehandle pa
On Wednesday, June 29, 2011 14:10:44 Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 06/29/2011 01:26 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This RFC is based on recent discussions with regards to how the poll
> > function
> > in a V4L2 driver should behave.
> >
> > Some relevant documents:
> >
> > POSIX:
Hi,
On 06/29/2011 01:26 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
Hi all,
This RFC is based on recent discussions with regards to how the poll function
in a V4L2 driver should behave.
Some relevant documents:
POSIX:
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/select.html
http://pubs.opengroup.org
Hi all,
This RFC is based on recent discussions with regards to how the poll function
in a V4L2 driver should behave.
Some relevant documents:
POSIX:
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/select.html
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/poll.html
http://
13 matches
Mail list logo
