Re: RFC: Introduction of M2M capability and buffer types

2010-09-28 Thread Hans Verkuil
> Any comments? No, other than what has been discussed on irc: - Add a new V4L2_CAP_VIDEO_M2M capability instead of ORing CAPTURE and OUTPUT. - Don't add aliases, just document better if needed. - The spec has to change so that M2M devices do not need buffers to be queued before calling STREAMON

Re: RFC: Introduction of M2M capability and buffer types

2010-09-28 Thread Kyungmin Park
Any comments? On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Kamil Debski wrote: > Hello, > > Mem2mem devices currently use V4L2_CAP_VIDEO_CAPTURE and > V4L2_CAP_VIDEO_OUTPUT capabilities. One might expect that a capture device is > a camera and an output device can display images. If I remember correct our

RFC: Introduction of M2M capability and buffer types

2010-09-14 Thread Kamil Debski
Hello, Mem2mem devices currently use V4L2_CAP_VIDEO_CAPTURE and V4L2_CAP_VIDEO_OUTPUT capabilities. One might expect that a capture device is a camera and an output device can display images. If I remember correct our discussion during the Helsinki v4l2 summit, Hans de Goede has pointed that su