Re: RFC: Improve VIDIOC_S_HW_FREQ_SEEK

2012-05-02 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Tuesday 01 May 2012 18:19:39 halli manjunatha wrote: > On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 4:46 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > Hi all! > > > > While working on a test function for the hardware seek functionality in > > v4l2-compliance I realized that the specification is rather vague and > > incomplete, making

Re: RFC: Improve VIDIOC_S_HW_FREQ_SEEK

2012-05-01 Thread halli manjunatha
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 4:46 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote: > Hi all! > > While working on a test function for the hardware seek functionality in > v4l2-compliance I realized that the specification is rather vague and > incomplete, making it hard to write a decent test for it. > > There are a number of is

RFC: Improve VIDIOC_S_HW_FREQ_SEEK

2012-05-01 Thread Hans Verkuil
Hi all! While working on a test function for the hardware seek functionality in v4l2-compliance I realized that the specification is rather vague and incomplete, making it hard to write a decent test for it. There are a number of issues with this API: 1) There is no way for the application to kn