On Monday 10 August 2009 17:07:51 Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote:
> Hans,
>
> I have already changed v4l2_i2c_new_probed_subdev() to
> v4l2_i2c_new_subdev_board() in my latest patch set for adding vpif capture
> driver for DM6467 that you had reviewed. I think this change is not needed
> once tha
---Original Message-
> >From: linux-media-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-media-
> >ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Subrahmanya, Chaithrika
> >Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 8:51 AM
> >To: 'Hans Verkuil'
> >Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
> &
il'
>Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
>Subject: RE: vpif_display.c bug
>
>On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:37:23, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> Hi Chaithrika,
>>
>> This code in vpif_display.c is not correct:
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < subdev_count; i++) {
>>
Hans,
I have already changed v4l2_i2c_new_probed_subdev() to
v4l2_i2c_new_subdev_board() in my latest patch set for adding vpif capture
driver for DM6467 that you had reviewed. I think this change is not needed
once that patch is applied.
Murali Karicheri
Software Design Engineer
Texas Instrume
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:37:23, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Hi Chaithrika,
>
> This code in vpif_display.c is not correct:
>
> for (i = 0; i < subdev_count; i++) {
> vpif_obj.sd[i] =
> v4l2_i2c_new_probed_subdev(&vpif_obj.v4l2_dev,
>
