Re: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit

2010-05-30 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Sunday 30 May 2010 09:59:59 Hans Verkuil wrote: > On Wednesday 26 May 2010 17:46:16 Pawel Osciak wrote: > > Hi Hans, > > > > thank you for your work on this! > > > > >Hans Verkuil wrote: > > > > >3) videobuf/videobuf2: what are the shortcomings, what are the requirements > > >for a 'proper' v

Re: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit

2010-05-30 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Sunday 23 May 2010 20:02:59 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Sun, 23 May 2010, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > This is a tentative agenda for the Helsinki mini-summit on June 14-16. > > > > Please reply to this thread if you have comments or want to add topics. > > [snip] > > > 8

Re: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit

2010-05-30 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Wednesday 26 May 2010 17:46:16 Pawel Osciak wrote: > Hi Hans, > > thank you for your work on this! > > >Hans Verkuil wrote: > > >3) videobuf/videobuf2: what are the shortcomings, what are the requirements > >for a 'proper' videobuf implementation, can the existing videobuf be fixed or > >do w

RE: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit

2010-05-27 Thread Pawel Osciak
>Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: >On Thu, 27 May 2010, Pawel Osciak wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: >> > >> >No idea whether this is a worthy and suitable topic for this meeting, but: >> > >> >V4L(2) video output vs. framebuffer. >> > >> >How about a v4l2-output - fbdev translatio

RE: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit

2010-05-27 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Thu, 27 May 2010, Pawel Osciak wrote: > Hi, > > >Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > > >No idea whether this is a worthy and suitable topic for this meeting, but: > > > >V4L(2) video output vs. framebuffer. > > > >How about a v4l2-output - fbdev translation layer? You write a v4l2-output > >drive

RE: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit

2010-05-27 Thread Pawel Osciak
Hi, >Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > >No idea whether this is a worthy and suitable topic for this meeting, but: > >V4L(2) video output vs. framebuffer. > >How about a v4l2-output - fbdev translation layer? You write a v4l2-output >driver and get a framebuffer device free of charge... TBH, I haven'

RE: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit

2010-05-26 Thread Hiremath, Vaibhav
ns de Goede; Mauro > Carvalho Chehab > Subject: Re: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit > > On Sun, 23 May 2010, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > This is a tentative agenda for the Helsinki mini-summit on June 14-16. > > > > Please

Re: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit

2010-05-26 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Wednesday 26 May 2010 17:47:57 Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to add my "RFC: a processing plugin API for libv4l" to the > schedule, see the mail I just send. This actually is one of the main > reasons for me to come to the summit. OK, I'll add it. I'll post an update topic list t

Re: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit

2010-05-26 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Wednesday 26 May 2010 17:46:16 Pawel Osciak wrote: > Hi Hans, > > thank you for your work on this! > > >Hans Verkuil wrote: > > >3) videobuf/videobuf2: what are the shortcomings, what are the requirements > >for a 'proper' videobuf implementation, can the existing videobuf be fixed or > >do w

RE: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit

2010-05-26 Thread Pawel Osciak
Hi Hans, thank you for your work on this! >Hans Verkuil wrote: >3) videobuf/videobuf2: what are the shortcomings, what are the requirements >for a 'proper' videobuf implementation, can the existing videobuf be fixed or >do we need a videobuf2. If the latter, what would be needed to convert >exis

Re: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit

2010-05-26 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, I would like to add my "RFC: a processing plugin API for libv4l" to the schedule, see the mail I just send. This actually is one of the main reasons for me to come to the summit. Thanks & Regards, Hans On 05/23/2010 12:36 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote: Hi all, This is a tentative agenda for th

Re: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit

2010-05-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Hans, On Sunday 23 May 2010 12:36:48 Hans Verkuil wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a tentative agenda for the Helsinki mini-summit on June 14-16. > > Please reply to this thread if you have comments or want to add topics. > > The overall layout of the summit is to use the first day to go through

Re: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit

2010-05-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Mauro, On Sunday 23 May 2010 14:21:46 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Hans Verkuil wrote: [snip] > > Comments? Topics I missed? > > I'd like to add another topic: Remote Controllers. I propose to do a short > presentation on this theme, showing how the new RC subsystem was conceived > and dis

Re: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit

2010-05-23 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Sun, 23 May 2010, Hans Verkuil wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a tentative agenda for the Helsinki mini-summit on June 14-16. > > Please reply to this thread if you have comments or want to add topics. [snip] > 8) soc-camera status. Particularly with regards to the remaining soc-camera >de

Re: Tentative agenda for Helsinki mini-summit

2010-05-23 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Hans Verkuil wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a tentative agenda for the Helsinki mini-summit on June 14-16. > > Please reply to this thread if you have comments or want to add topics. > > The overall layout of the summit is to use the first day to go through all > topics and either come to a conclu