Re: [PATCH v6 5/7] davinci vpbe: platform specific additions

2010-12-16 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Hello. On 15-12-2010 18:54, Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote: I think the DM644x EVM board changes should be in a separate patch. Any reason? The resaon is simple: you shouldn't mix SoC-level and board-level changes. Murali Karicheri Software Design Engineer Texas Instruments Inc. German

RE: [PATCH v6 5/7] davinci vpbe: platform specific additions

2010-12-15 Thread Karicheri, Muralidharan
i-linux-open-source-boun...@linux.davincidsp.com] On Behalf >Of Sergei Shtylyov >Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 6:20 AM >To: Hadli, Manjunath >Cc: dlos; Mauro Carvalho Chehab; LMML >Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/7] davinci vpbe: platform specific additions > >Hello. > >On

Re: [PATCH v6 5/7] davinci vpbe: platform specific additions

2010-12-15 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Hello. On 15-12-2010 12:11, Manjunath Hadli wrote: This patch implements the overall device creation for the Video display driver, and addition of tables for the mode and output list. Signed-off-by: Manjunath Hadli Acked-by: Muralidharan Karicheri Acked-by: Hans Verkuil [...] diff --git a