Hi Manju,
In the subject line, calling mach/dm646x.h obsolete
is not right since as of this patch mach/dm646x.h
still exists.
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 17:41:50, Hadli, Manjunath wrote:
> remove inclusion of header files from vpif.h and vpif_dispaly.c
> and add appropriate header file for building.
Mauro,
Sekhar needs your ack on this to get a series of mach patches in. Can you
please have a look at this?
-Manju
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 17:41:50, Hadli, Manjunath wrote:
> remove inclusion of header files from vpif.h and vpif_dispaly.c and add
> appropriate header file for building.
>
>