On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 18:45:03, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 March 2011, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
> > .. but forgot to fix this. There is nothing wrong with
> > using writel, but it doesn't fit into what the subject
> > of this patch is.
>
> Well, to be more exact, the __raw_writel was actual
On Tuesday 22 March 2011, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
> .. but forgot to fix this. There is nothing wrong with
> using writel, but it doesn't fit into what the subject
> of this patch is.
Well, to be more exact, the __raw_writel was actually
wrong here and it should be writel(), but it's certainly
better
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 19:28:43, Hadli, Manjunath wrote:
> Current devices.c file has a number of instances where
> IO_ADDRESS() is used for system module register
> access. Eliminate this in favor of a ioremap()
> based access.
>
> Consequent to this, a new global pointer davinci_sysmodbase
> ha
