>>
>> This is the version v2 of the patch series. This is the reworked
>> version of the driver based on comments received against the last
>> version of the patch.
>
>I'll be glad to see this get to mainline ... it's seeming closer
>and closer!
>
>What's the merge plan though? I had hopes for 2
On Thursday 11 June 2009, m-kariche...@ti.com wrote:
> VPFE Capture driver for DaVinci Media SOCs :- DM355 and DM6446
>
> This is the version v2 of the patch series. This is the reworked
> version of the driver based on comments received against the last
> version of the patch.
I'll be glad to se
inux-open-
>sou...@linux.davincidsp.com; Muralidharan Karicheri
>Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/10 - v2] ARM: DaVinci: Video: DM355/DM6446 VPFE
>Capture driver
>
>On Tuesday 09 June 2009 20:46:44 m-kariche...@ti.com wrote:
>> From: Muralidharan Karicheri
>>
>> VPFE Capture d
On Tuesday 09 June 2009 20:46:44 m-kariche...@ti.com wrote:
> From: Muralidharan Karicheri
>
> VPFE Capture driver for DaVinci Media SOCs :- DM355 and DM6446
>
> This is the version v2 of the patch series. This is the reworked
> version of the driver based on comments received against the last
> v
Hello all,
My patch 1/10 of this series somehow doesn't make it to
linux-me...@vger.kernel.org. I can see it locally.
Here is the header part of the patch. I can't see any thing wrong.
I have tried re-sending with subject changed as follows, but nothing helped.
Do you know what could cause this
