Hello,
On Tuesday, October 11, 2011 1:26 PM Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> On 10/11/2011 12:50 PM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Tuesday, October 11, 2011 9:30 AM Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/11/2011 09:17 AM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> >>> On Monday, October 10, 2011 2:08 PM Ma
Hello,
On Tuesday, October 11, 2011 9:30 AM Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> On 10/11/2011 09:17 AM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > On Monday, October 10, 2011 2:08 PM Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> >
> > During our stress tests, we encountered some problems :
> >
> > 1) Contiguous allocation lockup:
Hello,
On Monday, October 10, 2011 2:08 PM Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> On 10/06/2011 03:54 PM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > Welcome everyone again,
> >
> > Once again I decided to post an updated version of the Contiguous Memory
> > Allocator patches.
> >
> > This version provides mainly a bugfix fo
On 10/06/2011 03:54 PM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
Welcome everyone again,
Once again I decided to post an updated version of the Contiguous Memory
Allocator patches.
This version provides mainly a bugfix for a very rare issue that might
have changed migration type of the CMA page blocks resulting
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1:58 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> IMHO it would be good to merge the entire series into 3.2, since
>> the ARM portion fixes an important bug (double mapping of memory
>> ranges with conflicting attributes) that we've l
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> IMHO it would be good to merge the entire series into 3.2, since
> the ARM portion fixes an important bug (double mapping of memory
> ranges with conflicting attributes) that we've lived with for far
> too long, but it really depends on how ev
