On Wed, 20 May 2009, Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote:
> Hi Guennadi,
>
> Thanks for your prompt reply. Where do I pick your latest mt9t031.c that
> has partial implementation of sub device model ? I can work on that and
> try to integrate the same. I will remove item 1) that I mentioned and
> al
2009 3:21 AM
>To: Karicheri, Muralidharan
>Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
>Subject: Re: MT9T031 and other similar sub devices...
>
>Hi Murali
>
>On Tue, 19 May 2009, Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote:
>
>> Hi, Guennadi Liakhovetski,
>>
>> Thanks for your
Hi Murali
On Tue, 19 May 2009, Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote:
> Hi, Guennadi Liakhovetski,
>
> Thanks for your effort to migrate the sensor drivers to sub device framework.
>
> We have interest in mt9t031 and other sensor drivers from Micron since
> this peripheral is used in our DM355/DM6446
Hi, Guennadi Liakhovetski,
Thanks for your effort to migrate the sensor drivers to sub device framework.
We have interest in mt9t031 and other sensor drivers from Micron since this
peripheral is used in our DM355/DM6446 EVMs as well. I have submitted a set of
patches for our vpfe_capture driver