Aleksandr V. Piskunov wrote:
> I'm getting closer to pinpointing the real problem and so far
> everything points to AMD SB700 chipset driver. Google says it has quite
> some hardware bugs and several workarounds in linux drivers...
If your googling didn't turn them up already, here's some more thr
On 09/11/2009 08:50 PM, Aleksandr V. Piskunov wrote:
Ok, I did read basics of USB 2.0 protocol, gotta love these 600 page specs..
So using my fresh knowledge I went away and hacked ce6230 to use Isochronous
transfer endpoint instead of Bulk one. And it helped, tuner works, no
corruption with af90
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Aleksandr V. Piskunov
wrote:
> Ok, I did read basics of USB 2.0 protocol, gotta love these 600 page specs..
> So using my fresh knowledge I went away and hacked ce6230 to use Isochronous
> transfer endpoint instead of Bulk one. And it helped, tuner works, no
> corr
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 05:38:08PM +0300, Antti Palosaari wrote:
> On 09/10/2009 10:39 PM, Aleksandr V. Piskunov wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 08:16:31PM +0300, Aleksandr V. Piskunov wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 05:48:22PM +0300, Antti Palosaari wrote:
Here it is, USB2.0 URB is now a
On 09/10/2009 10:39 PM, Aleksandr V. Piskunov wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 08:16:31PM +0300, Aleksandr V. Piskunov wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 05:48:22PM +0300, Antti Palosaari wrote:
Here it is, USB2.0 URB is now about 16k both af9015 and ce6230 devices.
Now powertop shows only about 220
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Antti Palosaari wrote:
> Eh, not all needed, but we need some kind of rule of thumb which URB size is
> suitable for bandwidth used. 512, 8k, 16k etc. It is not wise at all set it
> to only 512 bytes when streaming whole TS example 22Mbit/sec. I have tested
> Anysee
On 09/10/2009 08:17 PM, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Antti Palosaari wrote:
Yes thats just what I tried to say for. Look my previous thread where all
currently sizes are listed. We need to define suitable values that are used.
For example USB2.0 DVB-C, DVB-T, ATSC
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 08:16:31PM +0300, Aleksandr V. Piskunov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 05:48:22PM +0300, Antti Palosaari wrote:
> > On 09/10/2009 04:47 PM, Antti Palosaari wrote:
> >> Aleksandr V. Piskunov wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 04:12:15PM +0300, Antti Palosaari wrote:
> >>>
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Antti Palosaari wrote:
> Yes thats just what I tried to say for. Look my previous thread where all
> currently sizes are listed. We need to define suitable values that are used.
> For example USB2.0 DVB-C, DVB-T, ATSC and same values for USB1.1 too. And
> stream si
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 05:48:22PM +0300, Antti Palosaari wrote:
> On 09/10/2009 04:47 PM, Antti Palosaari wrote:
>> Aleksandr V. Piskunov wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 04:12:15PM +0300, Antti Palosaari wrote:
Aleksandr V. Piskunov wrote:
>> Here is a test case:
>> Two DVB-T USB a
Devin Heitmueller wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Antti Palosaari wrote:
Devin Heitmueller wrote:
The URB size is something that varies on a device-by-device basis,
depending on the bridge chipset. There really is no
"one-size-fits-all" value you can assume.
I doubt no. I tested las
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Antti Palosaari wrote:
> Devin Heitmueller wrote:
>>
>> The URB size is something that varies on a device-by-device basis,
>> depending on the bridge chipset. There really is no
>> "one-size-fits-all" value you can assume.
>
> I doubt no. I tested last week rathe
Devin Heitmueller wrote:
The URB size is something that varies on a device-by-device basis,
depending on the bridge chipset. There really is no
"one-size-fits-all" value you can assume.
I doubt no. I tested last week rather many USB chips and all I tested
allowed to set it as x188 or x512 by
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Antti Palosaari wrote:
> Here it is, USB2.0 URB is now about 16k both af9015 and ce6230 devices.
> Now powertop shows only about 220 wakeups on my computer for the both
> sticks.
> Please test and tell what powertop says:
> http://linuxtv.org/hg/~anttip/urb_size/
>
On 09/10/2009 04:47 PM, Antti Palosaari wrote:
Aleksandr V. Piskunov wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 04:12:15PM +0300, Antti Palosaari wrote:
Aleksandr V. Piskunov wrote:
Here is a test case:
Two DVB-T USB adapters, dvb_usb_af9015 and dvb_usb_af9015.
Different tuners,
Err, make it: dvb_usb_af9
Aleksandr V. Piskunov wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 04:12:15PM +0300, Antti Palosaari wrote:
Aleksandr V. Piskunov wrote:
Here is a test case:
Two DVB-T USB adapters, dvb_usb_af9015 and dvb_usb_af9015. Different tuners,
Err, make it: dvb_usb_af9015 and dvb_usb_ce6230
Those both uses currently
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 04:12:15PM +0300, Antti Palosaari wrote:
> Aleksandr V. Piskunov wrote:
>>> Here is a test case:
>>> Two DVB-T USB adapters, dvb_usb_af9015 and dvb_usb_af9015. Different tuners,
>>
>> Err, make it: dvb_usb_af9015 and dvb_usb_ce6230
>
> Those both uses currently too small bul
Aleksandr V. Piskunov wrote:
Here is a test case:
Two DVB-T USB adapters, dvb_usb_af9015 and dvb_usb_af9015. Different tuners,
Err, make it: dvb_usb_af9015 and dvb_usb_ce6230
Those both uses currently too small bulk urbs, only 512 bytes. I have
asked suitable bulk urb size for ~20mbit/sec us
>
> Here is a test case:
> Two DVB-T USB adapters, dvb_usb_af9015 and dvb_usb_af9015. Different tuners,
Err, make it: dvb_usb_af9015 and dvb_usb_ce6230
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo in
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 12:58:07PM +0200, Markus Rechberger wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Aleksandr V. Piskunov
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 05:59:07PM -0400, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Clinton Meyer
> >> wrote:
> >> > Purchased a Hauppauge
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Aleksandr V. Piskunov
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 05:59:07PM -0400, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Clinton Meyer
>> wrote:
>> > Purchased a Hauppauge WinTV-HVR-950Q USB Hybrid TV stick to capture ATSC
>> > OTA TV.
>> >
>> > Am r
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 05:59:07PM -0400, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Clinton Meyer wrote:
> > Purchased a Hauppauge WinTV-HVR-950Q USB Hybrid TV stick to capture ATSC
> > OTA TV.
> >
> > Am running MEPIS 8.06 on all three machines, Debian 5 Lenny based, KDE
> > 3.5.
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Clinton Meyer wrote:
> Purchased a Hauppauge WinTV-HVR-950Q USB Hybrid TV stick to capture ATSC OTA
> TV.
>
> Am running MEPIS 8.06 on all three machines, Debian 5 Lenny based, KDE
> 3.5.10, kernel 2.6.27-1-mepis-smp
>
> All three machines now have wireless blocked,
Purchased a Hauppauge WinTV-HVR-950Q USB Hybrid TV stick to capture ATSC OTA TV.
Am running MEPIS 8.06 on all three machines, Debian 5 Lenny based, KDE
3.5.10, kernel 2.6.27-1-mepis-smp
All three machines now have wireless blocked, either do not connect or
all packets dropped/blocked if a connect
24 matches
Mail list logo