Hans,
I've summarized your comments into a few answers, to avoid repeating myself.
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:53:42 +0100
Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Hi Mauro,
>
> Just one last reply, and than we can close this discussion. Luckily the
> conversion of this driver to v4l2_device/subdev is a lot simpler
Hi Mauro,
Just one last reply, and than we can close this discussion. Luckily the
conversion of this driver to v4l2_device/subdev is a lot simpler than I
feared initially. So no harm done in that respect.
On Thursday 12 March 2009 14:20:11 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:1
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:14:22 +0100 (CET)
"Hans Verkuil" wrote:
> Mauro, you did not answer the question why this driver was just merged
> without going through a public review? If I'd seen it beforehand I'd have
> worked together with Sri to get it fixed first. I don't expect him to know
> about
>
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 08:38:59 +0100
> Hans Verkuil wrote:
>
>> Mauro,
>>
>> What the hell??!
>>
>> Since when does a big addition like this get merged without undergoing a
>> public review?
>>
>> I've been working my ass off converting drivers to the new i2c API and
>> v4l2_subdev structures a
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 08:38:59 +0100
Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Mauro,
>
> What the hell??!
>
> Since when does a big addition like this get merged without undergoing a
> public review?
>
> I've been working my ass off converting drivers to the new i2c API and
> v4l2_subdev structures and here you
On Thursday 12 March 2009 02:40:09 Patch from Sri Deevi wrote:
> The patch number 10954 was added via Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> to http://linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb master development
> tree.
>
> Kernel patches in this development tree may be modified to be backward
> compatible with older kernels. Comp
