Re: [linux-v4l] Some questions about v4l2 exposure control on camera device

2009-01-07 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, DongSoo Kim wrote: Hi Mauro. Thank you for your advise. I'll propose V4L2 API extension asap as you mentioned. By the way, I'm working on S3C6410 and OMAP3 with CE131(from NEC) and MB91690(from Fujitsu). (ce131 and mb91690 are ISPs) But I think there is no camera interfac

Re: [linux-v4l] Some questions about v4l2 exposure control on camera device

2009-01-07 Thread DongSoo Kim
Hi Mauro. Thank you for your advise. I'll propose V4L2 API extension asap as you mentioned. By the way, I'm working on S3C6410 and OMAP3 with CE131(from NEC) and MB91690(from Fujitsu). (ce131 and mb91690 are ISPs) But I think there is no camera interface drivers for OMAP3 and S3C6410 on kernel

Re: [linux-v4l] Some questions about v4l2 exposure control on camera device

2009-01-07 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Hi DongSoo, On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:38:56 +0900 "DongSoo Kim" wrote: > Hello V4L2 people. > > I'm working on camera device drivers over 5M pixel and made drivers > based on V4L2 API. > > Actually I'm still working on it. Good to hear! > By the way, I have some questions in exposure control. >

[linux-v4l] Some questions about v4l2 exposure control on camera device

2009-01-06 Thread DongSoo Kim
Hello V4L2 people. I'm working on camera device drivers over 5M pixel and made drivers based on V4L2 API. Actually I'm still working on it. By the way, I have some questions in exposure control. If my guess is right, V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE_* CIDs are what I'm looking for. Control factors that I int